divya writes:
> While running systemtap tests on the p6 machine , against the kernel version
> 2.6.36-rc7-git3
> Oops occured , here are the call trace
>
> BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#6, stapio/20398
> -- 0:conmux-control -- time-stamp -- Oct/13/10 2:49:18 --res
> lock: c0fcfa18,
divya writes:
> While running systemtap tests on the p6 machine , against the kernel
> version 2.6.36-rc7-git3 Oops occured , here are the call trace
Did the oops happen during a systemtap module startup vs. operation
vs. shutdown? stap -V version string?
> BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#6,
Anton Vorontsov writes:
> Here are some patches that add systemtap support for ppc32 machines.
> [...]
Thanks, committed, with a little extra for ppc64 compatibility.
- FChE
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozl
Josh Boyer writes:
> [...] While I would love to believe that systemtap should work
> everywhere, I can't really see it running on an embedded board at
> this point.
FWIW, we have had people running (not compiling) systemtap probe
modules on embedded systems. See "stap -p4" or "stap-server".
