> arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h | 6 +-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h
> > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h
> > index 3dd36c5e334a..422d7735ace6 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h
> > @@ -82,7 +82,11 @@ static inline void syscall_set_return_value(struct
> > task_struct *task,
> >*/
> > if (error) {
> > regs->ccr |= 0x1000L;
> > - regs->gpr[3] = error;
> > + /*
> > + * In case of an error regs->gpr[3] contains
> > + * a positive ERRORCODE.
> > + */
> > + regs->gpr[3] = -error;
> > } else {
> > regs->ccr &= ~0x1000L;
> > regs->gpr[3] = val;
>
--
Eugene Syromyatnikov
mailto:evg...@gmail.com
xmpp:esyr@jabber.{ru|org}
the lack of the v2
ABI and scv there), so I would suggest to consider any deviation from
that a kernel programming error to be fixed.
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/arch/powerpc/syscall64-abi.rst?id=v6.13#n30
--
Eugene Syromyatnikov
mailto:evg...@gmail.com
xmpp:esyr@jabber.{ru|org}
different bit-widths within the "same"
architecture are different.
> This isn't unique to this patch in any way; the only way to handle it is
> by keeping track of each ABI.
That's true, but this patch doesn't even try to address that.
--
Eugene Syromyatnikov
mailto:evg...@gmail.com
xmpp:esyr@jabber.{ru|org}
