Eran Liberty wrote:
Eran Liberty wrote:
This should probably go to the Freescale support, as it feels like a
hardware issue yet the end result is a very frozen Linux kernel so I
post here first...
I have a programmable FPGA PCIe device connected to a Freescale's
P2020 PCIe port. As pa
Eran Liberty wrote:
This should probably go to the Freescale support, as it feels like a
hardware issue yet the end result is a very frozen Linux kernel so I
post here first...
I have a programmable FPGA PCIe device connected to a Freescale's
P2020 PCIe port. As part of the bring-up
tiejun.chen wrote:
AFAIK we can set one bit on PEX_ERR_DISR to detect PCI Express completion
time-out. If so one interrupt should be issued. But I'm not sure if this can fix
your issue.
Tiejun
As I understand the problem, this will not help me as the CPU itself is
on hold waiting for the ass
This should probably go to the Freescale support, as it feels like a
hardware issue yet the end result is a very frozen Linux kernel so I
post here first...
I have a programmable FPGA PCIe device connected to a Freescale's P2020
PCIe port. As part of the bring-up tests, we are testing two faul
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
- pcie_portdrv_probe() will be called for every BRIDGE class PCI device. P2020 PCIe is a PCI-PCI BRIDGE class so no problem here.
- The code will continue to check that we have PCI_CAP_ID_EXP capability, which we have and continue to pcie_port_device_register().
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 7, 2010, at 7:30 AM, Eran Liberty wrote:
Dear Penguins,
SHORT:
There is a BUG in the current code design / Freescale P2020/85xx PCIe design
that prevent it from registering to the PCIe AER... or that I have missed
something :) ..
LESS SHORT:
I am in the process
Dear Penguins,
SHORT:
There is a BUG in the current code design / Freescale P2020/85xx PCIe design
that prevent it from registering to the PCIe AER... or that I have missed
something :) ..
LESS SHORT:
I am in the process of a Freescale P2020 based board bring up. P2020 is
basically two 85xx p
Jon Smirl wrote:
Manually edit the broken binary to change the order of the restore and
see if the problem disappears. That will keep everything else
constant.
checked with objdump where __d_lookup()
> powerpc-linux-gnu-objdump -dr --start-address=0xc0065790 vmlinux |
grep "<__d_lookup>:"
Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Eran Liberty wrote:
Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Found the problem (or at least -a- problem), it's a gcc bug.
Well, fi
Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Found the problem (or at least -a- problem), it's a gcc bug.
Well, first I must say the code generated by -pg is just plain
horrible :-)
Appart from that, look at the
Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Eran Liberty wrote:
Steven Rostedt wrote:
Testing tracer sched_switch: PASSED
Testing tracer ftrace: PASSED
Testing dynamic ftrace: PASSED
Do you have PREEMPT_TRACER enabled, or any other tracer for that matter?
-- Steve
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
Can you also give us
objdump -S --start-address=0xC00BB724 vmlinux | head 20
?
Then we could compare the result with the OOPS instruction dump :
7c0802a6 bf61000c 3f60c038 7c3f0b78 90010024 7c7c1b78 7c9d2378 83db32a0
73c1 7f83e378 7fa4eb78 4082002f <> 2f83
Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Eran Liberty wrote:
Steven Rostedt wrote:
Eran Liberty wrote:
After compiling a kernel with ftrace I started to experience all sorts of
crashes.
Just to make sure...
ftrace enables markers too, and RCU has tracing with the
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
Can you check if, at some point during the system execution (starting
from boot), 0xdd5b1d58 is an address where a module is loaded ? (the
module can be later unloaded, what I wonder is if this address would
appear to have had a loaded+unloaded module).
Actually, could y
Steven Rostedt wrote:
Eran Liberty wrote:
After compiling a kernel with ftrace I started to experience all
sorts of crashes.
Just to make sure...
ftrace enables markers too, and RCU has tracing with the markers. This
may not be the problem, but I just want to eliminate as many variables
as
15 matches
Mail list logo
