Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/15/2008 06:02:03 PM:
> Corey J Ashford writes:
>
> > Thanks for the feedback. I don't believe I need a separate flag,
because
> > the PMU interrupt (via the PMAO bit) will still be pending when
interrupts
> > are
Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/15/2008 06:02:03 PM:
> Corey J Ashford writes:
>
> > Thanks for the feedback. I don't believe I need a separate flag,
because
> > the PMU interrupt (via the PMAO bit) will still be pending when
interrupts
> &
Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/15/2008 04:36:02 PM:
> Corey J Ashford writes:
>
> > Ideally, what I'm looking for is something that mimics the operation of
> > MASKABLE_EXCEPTION_PSERIES.
> > I've been looking at the kernel code (entry_
Just FYI: I just tried out the code I suggested below, and it does not
work; it results in a system hang. I have spent some time analyzing why
this doesn't work as I expected, but so far I haven't been able to figure
it out.
Regards,
Corey Ashford
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center,
Hi Benjamin and Olaf,
Thanks for the suggestions.
Ideally, what I'm looking for is something that mimics the operation of
MASKABLE_EXCEPTION_PSERIES.
I've been looking at the kernel code (entry_64.S, exception.h, head_64.S)
but am finding it quite complicated and hard to follow, particularly in t
