On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Mahesh J Salgaonkar
wrote:
>
> During free we do free all of them including RMO region. But since the rtas
> region is always on top of RMO, crashkernel memory overlaps rtas region and
> we endup freeing that even, which is causing the crash.
>
Okay, but with this
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:46:57PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>> The crashkernel region is specified via kernel cmdline, so why
>> not just drop a failure when it overlaps with RMO region?
>> Am I missing something?
>
>Unfortunately a ppc64 kernel requires a chunk of RMO memory. We woul
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 12:02:06PM +0530, Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar wrote:
>On 08/25/2010 06:07 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Anton Blanchard writes:
>>
>>> On ppc64 the crashkernel region almost always overlaps an area of firmware.
>>> This works fine except when using the sysfs interface to
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:46:09AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>> Hey all-
>> About 2 years ago now, I sent this patch upstream to allow makedumpfile
>> to properly filter cores on ppc64:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/ke...@lists.infradea
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:05 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
wrote:
>> --- linux-2.6-ozlabs.orig/fs/exec.c
>> +++ linux-2.6-ozlabs/fs/exec.c
>> @@ -627,10 +627,13 @@ int setup_arg_pages(struct linux_binprm
>> goto out_unlock;
>> }
>>
>> + stack_base = min(EXTRA_STACK_VM_PAGES *
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Zhiyong Wu wrote
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Américo Wang
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Zhiyong Wu wrote:
>>> HI,
>>>
>>> linux-2.6.32 is compiled on a p6 machine with RH5.4 OS and KVM option is
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Zhiyong Wu wrote:
> HI,
>
> linux-2.6.32 is compiled on a p6 machine with RH5.4 OS and KVM option is
> enable.
>
> When rebooting this machine, a crash takes place such as:
>
> Loading ramdisk...
> ramdisk loaded at 0170, size: 2700 Kbytes
> OF stdout device
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Alan Jenkins
wrote:
> On 10/20/09, Américo Wang wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 02:15:33PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>>BUILD_BUG_ON used to use the optimizer to do code elimination or fail
>>>at link time; it was changed to f
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 02:15:33PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>BUILD_BUG_ON used to use the optimizer to do code elimination or fail
>at link time; it was changed to first the size of a negative array (a
>nicer compile time error), then (in
>8c87df457cb58fe75b9b893007917cf8095660a0) to a bitfield.
