On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:43:59PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Anybody aware of anything other than Cell using that driver ?
>
> I'd like to make it a platform driver instead of having something that
> pokes at anything that has a "device_type" set to "nvram" (which is
> gross and bogus
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:17:37PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> I am getting confused about on how to test for Endian in the kernel code. In
> user
> space one uses #if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN or #if __BYTE_ORDER ==
> __BIG_ENDIAN
>
> I can see lots of kernel headers using this test
I forgot about this patch. Can this still be merged?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:05:42PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> Using the RTAS watchdog driver to read out the temperature crashes
> on a PXCAB:
>
> Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0xfe347b50
> Fault
ture)" in rtas_call() is
removed by using the function rtas_get_sensor() which does the
right thing.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Reber
---
v2: use rtas_get_sensor(); typo fixed
---
drivers/watchdog/wdrtas.c |8 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watch
even helps. I have no tried the watchdog until now, but without the
patch I get:
wdrtas: could not get sp_spi watchdog timeout (0). Continuing
and with the patch it reads the correct value. So only with your patch
it works like it is supposed to. Thanks!
Tested-by: Adrian Reber
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 03:27:18PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 13:35 +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > Using the RTAS watchdog driver to read out the temperature crashes
> > on a PXCAB:
> >
> > Unable to handle kernel paging request for
t.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Reber
---
drivers/watchdog/wdrtas.c |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Fix for:
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0xfe347b50
Faulting instruction address: 0xc001af64
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
S
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 09:51:23AM -0600, Milton Miller wrote:
> Is SLOF just exposing the user image part of the flash device? Or is it
> the raw flash device?
SLOF is exposing the raw flash device.
> I need to keep this quick, but am intrested in a few more details. My
> first reaction is
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:52:56AM -0600, Milton Miller wrote:
> On Sun Jan 11 at 02:31:22 EST in 2009, Adrian Reber wrote:
>> This adds support for a simple character device to access the
>> flash for SLOF based systems like the PowerStation, QS2x and
>> PXCAB. In the SLO
image to the flash and then directly boot the kernel from the
flash.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Reber
---
This is based on the mmio NVRAM driver. I am not sure how useful this
is for anybody else but I am posting it anyway, hoping to get some
feedback. Also hoping it can be included at one point
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 05:59:33PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> D'oh. I spent so much time and the solution is so easy.
>>
>> Thanks everybody. I have updated to binutils-2.18.50.0.6-2.ppc and now
>> it works again on QS22 and JS21.
>
> So I checked your binary, and the only differences betw
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 09:45:32AM +1000, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> > Somehow I expect that I am doing something wrong, because nobody else
> > has reported something like this yet.
>
> Seems to work fine here - just booted 945754a on a QS22 with
> cell_defconfig:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat /proc/
I have a custom config to build a kernel which runs on JS21/QS21/QS22.
Starting with 2.6.26-rc1 that fails on JS21 (with SLOF). Bisecting lead
me to the following commit:
commit 366234f657879aeb7a1e2ca582f2f24f3fae9269
Author: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed Apr 16 05:52:28 2008 +10
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 06:13:23PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
> Currently we set the start of the .text section to be 4Mb for pSeries.
> In situations where the zImage is > 8Mb we'll fail to boot (due to
> overlapping with OF). Move .text in a zImage from 4MB to 64MB (well past OF).
>
> We still w
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 08:06:18AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 16:47 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > On a JS20 with SLOF (pretending to be Maple) 2.6.23-rc1 breaks with
> > following oops. 2.6.22 is working. Let me know if I can help debug this.
>
On a JS20 with SLOF (pretending to be Maple) 2.6.23-rc1 breaks with
following oops. 2.6.22 is working. Let me know if I can help debug this.
Maple: Found RTC at IO 0x1070
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0xd8001070
Faulting instruction address: 0xc004d948
16 matches
Mail list logo