On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 01:18:52 +0200 Andrey Ryabinin
wrote:
> >> Architectures that need deferred KASAN should select this option.
> >> Architectures that can enable KASAN early will get compile-time
> >> optimizations instead of runtime checks.
> >
> > Looks nice and appears quite mature. I'm r
On 7/18/25 12:10 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 19:27:21 +0500 Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
> wrote:
>
>> Introduce CONFIG_ARCH_DEFER_KASAN to identify architectures that need
>> to defer KASAN initialization until shadow memory is properly set up.
>>
>> Some architectures (like Power
On 7/17/25 4:27 PM, Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov wrote:
> UserMode Linux needs deferred KASAN initialization as it has a custom
> kasan_arch_is_ready() implementation that tracks shadow memory readiness
> via the kasan_um_is_ready flag.
>
> Select ARCH_DEFER_KASAN to enable the unified static key mecha
On 7/17/25 4:27 PM, Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kasan.h
> b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kasan.h
> index 62f139a9c87..0e50e5b5e05 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kasan.h
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kasan.h
> @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@
> #define
On 7/17/25 4:27 PM, Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov wrote:
> Historically, the runtime static key kasan_flag_enabled existed only for
> CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS mode. Generic and SW_TAGS modes either relied on
> architecture-specific kasan_arch_is_ready() implementations or evaluated
> KASAN checks uncondition
On 7/17/25 4:27 PM, Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov wrote:
> Introduce CONFIG_ARCH_DEFER_KASAN to identify architectures that need
> to defer KASAN initialization until shadow memory is properly set up.
>
> Some architectures (like PowerPC with radix MMU) need to set up their
> shadow memory mappings befo
On 7/17/25 4:27 PM, Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov wrote:
> === Testing with patches
>
> Testing in v3:
>
> - Compiled every affected arch with no errors:
>
> $ make CC=clang LD=ld.lld AR=llvm-ar NM=llvm-nm STRIP=llvm-strip \
> OBJCOPY=llvm-objcopy OBJDUMP=llvm-objdump READELF=llvm-readelf \
>
Hi Breno,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 97987520025658f30bb787a99ffbd9bbff9ffc9d]
url:
https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Breno-Leitao/vmcoreinfo-Track-and-log-recoverable-hardware-errors/20250721-181439
base
Hello Borislav,
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 03:57:18PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 03:13:40AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > Introduce a generic infrastructure for tracking recoverable hardware
> > errors (HW errors that did not cause a panic) and record them for vmcore
> >
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 03:13:40AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Introduce a generic infrastructure for tracking recoverable hardware
> errors (HW errors that did not cause a panic) and record them for vmcore
> consumption. This aids post-mortem crash analysis tools by preserving
> a count and times
Hi Breno,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on 97987520025658f30bb787a99ffbd9bbff9ffc9d]
url:
https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Breno-Leitao/vmcoreinfo-Track-and-log-recoverable-hardware-errors/20250721-181439
base
From: Bartosz Golaszewski
The conversion to using the new GPIO line setter callbacks missed the
set_multiple() in this file. Convert it to using the new callback.
Fixes: 52ccf19527fd ("soc: fsl: qe: use new GPIO line value setter callbacks")
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski
---
This is a foll
Introduce a generic infrastructure for tracking recoverable hardware
errors (HW errors that did not cause a panic) and record them for vmcore
consumption. This aids post-mortem crash analysis tools by preserving
a count and timestamp for the last occurrence of such errors.
This patch adds centrali
Hello Tony,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 05:36:50PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > I found that I don't need to expose the metrics in vmcore info at all to
> > be able to read them from vmcore, given crash/drgn can read those
> > symbols.
> >
> > Global variable hwerror_tracking will be write-only during
From: Siyang Liu <1972843...@qq.com>
When the 'pic-router' device node lookup fails in holly_init_IRQ(),
the function returns without releasing the previously acquired
'tsi_pci' node. This violates the device tree reference counting
rules and causes a resource leak.
This issue was detected by rul
15 matches
Mail list logo