On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 00:49:25 +0530
Hari Bathini wrote:
> For ppc64le, depending on the kernel configuration used, offset 16
> from function start address can also be considered function entry.
> Update the test case to accommodate such configurations.
>
Hi Hari, so have you met any error on thi
On 11/2/24 5:36 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 07:08:43PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 12:05:01PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
The only issue resulting from *not* taking this patch is that btrfs
may misidentify the CRC32 implementation as being 'slow' and t
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 at 17:36, Eric Biggers wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 07:08:43PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 12:05:01PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > >
> > > The only issue resulting from *not* taking this patch is that btrfs
> > > may misidentify the CRC32 imple
On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 07:08:43PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 12:05:01PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > The only issue resulting from *not* taking this patch is that btrfs
> > may misidentify the CRC32 implementation as being 'slow' and take an
> > alternative code pat
On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 12:05:01PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> The only issue resulting from *not* taking this patch is that btrfs
> may misidentify the CRC32 implementation as being 'slow' and take an
> alternative code path, which does not necessarily result in worse
> performance.
If we we
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 at 11:46, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 at 11:20, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 10:58:53AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > >
> > > At least btrfs supports a variety of checksums/hashes (crc32c, xxhash,
> > > sha) via the shash API.
> >
> > OK
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 at 11:20, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 10:58:53AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > At least btrfs supports a variety of checksums/hashes (crc32c, xxhash,
> > sha) via the shash API.
>
> OK, given that btrfs is still doing this, I think we should still
> regi
On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 10:58:53AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> At least btrfs supports a variety of checksums/hashes (crc32c, xxhash,
> sha) via the shash API.
OK, given that btrfs is still doing this, I think we should still
register crc32c-arch conditionally. Having it point to crc32c-gene
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 at 10:45, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> Eric Biggers wrote:
> >
> > While testing this patchset I notice that none of the crypto API drivers for
> > crc32 or crc32c even need to be loaded on my system anymore, as everything
> > on my
> > system that uses those algorithms (such as ext4
Eric Biggers wrote:
>
> While testing this patchset I notice that none of the crypto API drivers for
> crc32 or crc32c even need to be loaded on my system anymore, as everything on
> my
> system that uses those algorithms (such as ext4) just uses the library APIs
> now.
> That makes the "check /
10 matches
Mail list logo
