[PATCH] ASoC: fsl: imx-pcm-fiq: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro

2024-06-15 Thread Jeff Johnson
fiq_exit); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Freescle i.MX PCM FIQ handler"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); --- base-commit: 83a7eefedc9b56fe7bfeff13b6c7356688ffa670 change-id: 20240615-md-arm-sound-soc-fsl-c598fb353e69

Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Introducing TIF_NOTIFY_IPI flag

2024-06-15 Thread Russell King (Oracle)
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 06:15:59PM +, K Prateek Nayak wrote: > o Dropping the ARM results since I never got my hands on the ARM64 > system I used in my last testing. If I do manage to get my hands on it > again, I'll rerun the experiments and share the results on the thread. > To test the

[PATCH] powerpc: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macros

2024-06-15 Thread Jeff Johnson
ysdev/rtc_cmos_setup.c @@ -66,4 +66,5 @@ static int __init add_rtc(void) } fs_initcall(add_rtc); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PPC RTC CMOS driver"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); --- base-commit: 83a7eefedc9b56fe7bfeff13b6c7356688ffa670 change-id: 20240615-md-powerpc-arch-powerpc-c8b981be95f8

[PATCH] KVM: PPC: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macros

2024-06-15 Thread Jeff Johnson
-buffer.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/test-guest-state-buffer.c @@ -325,4 +325,5 @@ static struct kunit_suite guest_state_buffer_test_suite = { kunit_test_suites(&guest_state_buffer_test_suite); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("KUnit tests for Guest State Buffer APIs"); MODULE_LICENSE("G

Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpc32xx: Add lpc32xx i2s DT binding

2024-06-15 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On 14/06/2024 18:34, Piotr Wojtaszczyk wrote: > Add nxp,lpc3220-i2s DT binding documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Piotr Wojtaszczyk Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might interfere with applying ent

Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Introducing TIF_NOTIFY_IPI flag

2024-06-15 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 03:28:14AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 12:48:37PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > The main problem is that need_resched becomes somewhat meaningless > > because it doesn't only mean "I need to resched a task" and we have > > to add more tests a

Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Introducing TIF_NOTIFY_IPI flag

2024-06-15 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 12:48:37PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > The main problem is that need_resched becomes somewhat meaningless > because it doesn't only mean "I need to resched a task" and we have > to add more tests around even for those not using polling The converse problem is that you

Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Introducing TIF_NOTIFY_IPI flag

2024-06-15 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 12:48:37PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 at 11:28, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Vincent [5] pointed out a case where the idle load kick will fail to > > > run on an idle CPU since the IPI handler launching the ILB will check > > > for need_resched(). I