Le 05/12/2021 à 22:44, Maxime Bizon a écrit :
>
>
> On Sunday 05 Dec 2021 à 18:11:59 (+), Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>>> Is BAT5 needed here ?
>>
>> Sure it is, because that's were kernel expects lowmem to be mapped.
>> Allthough the kernel will unlikely access the 128M reserved for KASAN
>
On Sunday 05 Dec 2021 à 18:11:59 (+), Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > Is BAT5 needed here ?
>
> Sure it is, because that's were kernel expects lowmem to be mapped.
> Allthough the kernel will unlikely access the 128M reserved for KASAN
> directly, the other 128M are still needed.
>
Yes tha
Le 05/12/2021 à 17:42, Maxime Bizon a écrit :
>
>
> On Saturday 04 Dec 2021 à 17:42:44 (+), Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>> I guess all the guard is in the comment ...
>>
>> /*
>>* Set up one of the I/D BAT (block address translation) register pairs.
>>* The parameters are not checked
Hello,
With CONFIG_DEBUG_VM=y, early_iounmap() triggers this:
VM_WARN_ON(pte_hw_valid(*ptep) && !pte_protnone(*ptep));
[0.292811] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:194
set_pte_at+0x8c/0x21c
[0.301053] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Tainted: GW 5.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215217
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Leroy (christophe.le...@csgroup.eu) ---
I tried your config under QEMU and it works. So I don't know how I could help.
>> =
>> OpenBIOS 1.1 [Jul 22 2021 22
On Saturday 04 Dec 2021 à 17:42:44 (+), Christophe Leroy wrote:
> I guess all the guard is in the comment ...
>
> /*
> * Set up one of the I/D BAT (block address translation) register pairs.
> * The parameters are not checked; in particular size must be a power
> * of 2 between 128k
struct of_device_id should normally be const
Signed-off-by: Xiang wangx
---
drivers/macintosh/mediabay.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/macintosh/mediabay.c b/drivers/macintosh/mediabay.c
index eab7e83c11c4..b17660c022eb 100644
--- a/drivers/macintosh
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215217
--- Comment #2 from Erhard F. (erhar...@mailbox.org) ---
Just rebuilt the kernel without KASAN but I still hit this bug.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215217
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Leroy (christophe.le...@csgroup.eu) ---
POWER9 doesn't have KASAN.
Did you try G4 without KASAN ?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assigne
