Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: Select CONFIG_PRINTK to fix build failure

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Sat, 2014-12-27 at 12:17 -0500, Pranith Kumar wrote: >> In an allnoconfig we get the following build failure: > > An allnoconfig doesn't include CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV? But I think I know what you > mean. > >> arch/powerpc/platforms/built-i

[PATCH v2] srcu: Isolate srcu sections using CONFIG_SRCU

Isolate the SRCU functions and data structures within CONFIG_SRCU so that there is a compile time failure if srcu is used when not enabled. This was decided to be better than waiting until link time for a failure to occur. There are places which include kvm headers and utilize kvm data structures

Re: [PATCH] srcu: Isolate srcu sections using CONFIG_SRCU

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Sat, 2014-12-27 at 12:17 -0500, Pranith Kumar wrote: >> Isolate the SRCU functions and data structures within CONFIG_SRCU so that >> there >> is a compile time failure if srcu is used when not enabled. This was decided >> to >> be better th

Re: [PATCH] srcu: Isolate srcu sections using CONFIG_SRCU

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Sat, 27 Dec 2014 12:17:43 -0500 > Pranith Kumar wrote: > >> @@ -65,10 +65,13 @@ >> #include >> #include >> #include >> -#include >> #include >> #include >> >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM) >> +#include >> +#endif >> + >> #

[PATCH] ASoC: fsl_esai: Fix incorrect xDC field width of xCCR registers

The xDC field should have 5 bit width according to Reference Manual. Thus this patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: Aurelien BOUIN Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen --- The patch was originally submitted by Aurelien BOUIN while in an informal way. And he hasn't finished any re-submitting during the past tw

Re: [PATCH] srcu: Isolate srcu sections using CONFIG_SRCU

On Sat, 2014-12-27 at 12:17 -0500, Pranith Kumar wrote: > Isolate the SRCU functions and data structures within CONFIG_SRCU so that > there > is a compile time failure if srcu is used when not enabled. This was decided > to > be better than waiting until link time for a failure to occur. Yes, fa

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v3.19-rc2

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > JFYI, when comparing v3.19-rc2[1] to v3.19-rc1[3], the summaries are: > - build errors: +8/-5 Surprise! No new R_PPC64_REL24 relocation truncations, hence not much new generic code was added. Bloat-o-meter on atari_defconfig agrees:

[PATCH] macintosh: ams: cleanup on stack DECLARE_COMPLETION

fix-up for incorrect use of DECLARE_COMPLETION. see also commit 6e9a4738 ("completions: lockdep annotate on stack completions") V2: split out patch for individual files and (hopefully) proper labeling this time patch is against linux-next 3.19.0-rc1 -next-20141226 patch was compile tested wi

Re: [PATCH] srcu: Isolate srcu sections using CONFIG_SRCU

On Sat, 27 Dec 2014 12:17:43 -0500 Pranith Kumar wrote: > @@ -65,10 +65,13 @@ > #include > #include > #include > -#include > #include > #include > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM) > +#include > +#endif > + > #ifdef DEBUG > #define DBG(fmt...) udbg_printf(fmt) > #else I always cringe

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/smp: Fix Non-boot cpus cannot be bring up.

On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 14:38 +0800, Dongsheng Wang wrote: > From: Wang Dongsheng > > Kernel cannot bring up Non-boot cpus always get "Processor xx is stuck". > this issue bring by http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/418912/ (powerpc: > Secondary CPUs must set cpu_callin_map after setting active and

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: Select CONFIG_PRINTK to fix build failure

On Sat, 2014-12-27 at 12:17 -0500, Pranith Kumar wrote: > In an allnoconfig we get the following build failure: An allnoconfig doesn't include CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV? But I think I know what you mean. > arch/powerpc/platforms/built-in.o: In function > `.__machine_initcall_powernv_opal_init': > opal