On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:30:47AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:26:27PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>>>On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
Currently, powernv platform is not aware of VFs. This means no
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 13:48 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 06/19/2014 11:50 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > On 06/19/2014 10:50 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >> On 06/19/2014 04:35 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 21:36 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>>
On ia64 and ppc64, the function pointer does not point the
entry address of the function, but the address of function
discriptor (which contains the entry address and misc
data.) Since the kprobes passes the function pointer stored
by NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() to kallsyms_lookup_size_offset() for
initalizi
(2014/06/20 9:37), Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 20:20 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2014/06/19 20:01), Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, those messages should be shown in dmesg when booting if it doesn't
>>> work,
>>> because the messages are printed by initial
add err interrupt for p1010rdb into dts.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang
---
Changes for v2:
- add binding documentation update
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt | 7 +--
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1010si-post.dtsi | 6 --
2 files changed, 9 inser
when flexcan is not physically linked, command 'cantest' will
trigger an err_irq, add err_irq handler for it.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang
---
Changes for v2:
- use a space instead of tab
- use flexcan_poll_state instead of print
drivers/net/can/flexcan.c | 31 +
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 20:20 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/06/19 20:01), Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> > Ah, those messages should be shown in dmesg when booting if it doesn't
> > work,
> > because the messages are printed by initialization process of kprobe
> > blacklist.
Hi Ben,
It looks like we may have missed this trivial fix? Can you please apply it to
your tree?
Regards,
Alistair
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 13:56:32 Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 18:06 +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
> > The original implementation of MMC support for Akebono introduced a
On 19.06.2014 [10:59:50 -0400], Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 04:31:57PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > I think what this really wants to do is NODE_DATA(cpu_to_mem(cpu)) and I
> > > thought ppc had the cpu-to-local-memory-node mappings correct?
> >
> > Except cpu_to_mem rel
On 21.05.2014 [14:58:12 -0400], Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 09:16:27AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 May 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > I'm seeing a panic at boot with this change on an LPAR which actually
> > > has no Node 0. Here's what I think
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 02:17:30PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> Anyway, we did get some folks to test the patches and was thus fairly
>> confident that we could merge them. Chris asked me to try to collect
>> them in a PR for him,
On 06/19/2014 06:28 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 02:17:30PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> Anyway, we did get some folks to test the patches and was thus fairly
>> confident that we could merge them. Chris asked me to try to collect
>> them in a PR for him, so I did.
On 06/18/2014 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
>
> I'm looking into lifecycle issues on nodes modified by OF_DYNAMIC, and
> I'm hoping you can help me. Right now, pseries seems to be the only
> user of OF_DYNAMIC, but making OF_DYNAMIC work has a huge impact on
> the entire ker
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 04:31:57PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > I think what this really wants to do is NODE_DATA(cpu_to_mem(cpu)) and I
> > thought ppc had the cpu-to-local-memory-node mappings correct?
>
> Except cpu_to_mem relies on the mapping being defined, but early in
> boot, spec
2014-06-18 18:56 GMT+04:00 Alexander Popov :
> 2014-06-18 17:37 GMT+04:00 Mark Rutland :
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:48:10AM +0100, Alexander Popov wrote:
>>> Introduce a device tree binding document for the MPC512x DMA controller
>>> +Optional properties:
>>> +- #dma-cells: the length of the DMA
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 02:17:30PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Anyway, we did get some folks to test the patches and was thus fairly
> confident that we could merge them. Chris asked me to try to collect
> them in a PR for him, so I did. Sorry if I managed to screw some
> things up, there were seve
(2014/06/19 20:01), Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Ah, those messages should be shown in dmesg when booting if it doesn't
> work,
> because the messages are printed by initialization process of kprobe
> blacklist.
> So, reproducing it is just enabling CONFIG_KPROBES and boot it.
>
(2014/06/19 18:45), Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> On 06/19/2014 12:56 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2014/06/19 15:40), Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>>> On 06/19/2014 10:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2014/06/19 10:30), Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramat
On 06/19/2014 12:56 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/06/19 15:40), Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>> On 06/19/2014 10:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>> (2014/06/19 10:30), Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/06/18 16:56), Michael Ellerma
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:30:47AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:26:27PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>>>On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
Currently, powernv platform is not aware of VFs. This means no
Hi Grant,
CCing Thomas Gleixner & Steven Rostedt, since they might have a few
ideas...
On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
>
> I'm looking into lifecycle issues on nodes modified by OF_DYNAMIC, and
> I'm hoping you can help me. Right now, pseries seems to be
On 06/19/2014 09:46 AM, Zhao Qiang wrote:
> when flexcan is not physically linked, command 'cantest' will
> trigger an err_irq, add err_irq handler for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang
> ---
> drivers/net/can/flexcan.c | 31 ++-
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1
On 06/19/2014 09:46 AM, Zhao Qiang wrote:
> add err interrupt for p1010rdb into dts.
Please update the flexcan binding documentation, too.
Marc
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang
> ---
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1010si-post.dtsi | 6 --
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:26:27PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>>On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>>> Currently, powernv platform is not aware of VFs. This means no dev-node
>>> represents a VF. Also, VF PCI device is created when
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 01:48:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 14:40:46 +0900 Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > PPC KVM's CMA area management requires arbitrary bitmap granularity,
> > since they want to reserve very large memory and manage this region
> > with bitmap that one bit fo
add err interrupt for p1010rdb into dts.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1010si-post.dtsi | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1010si-post.dtsi
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1010si-post.dtsi
index 4313ff6..b
when flexcan is not physically linked, command 'cantest' will
trigger an err_irq, add err_irq handler for it.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang
---
drivers/net/can/flexcan.c | 31 ++-
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/dr
(2014/06/19 15:40), Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> On 06/19/2014 10:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2014/06/19 10:30), Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2014/06/18 16:56), Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:38 +0900, Masa
Commit d92a208d086 ("powerpc/pci: Mask linkDown on resetting PCI bus")
implemented same logic (resetting PCI secondary bus by bridge's config
register PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_BUS_RESET) in PCI core and arch-dependent
code. In order to avoid the duplicate implementation introduced by the
commit, the patch pu
Since the logic to reset PCI secondary bus by PCI config register
PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_BUS_RESET is included in pci_reset_secondary_bus(),
we needn't implement another one of ourself. The patch removes the
duplicate implementation and calls pci_reset_secondary_bus().
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan
---
arch
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 13:49 +0800, Mike Qiu wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> The config file has attached ...
Thanks.
Nothing is obviously broken in there.
Can you try building with POWERNV=n, I think that will fix it.
cheers
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
31 matches
Mail list logo
