Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/kvm: remove redundant assignment

2013-11-06 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 08:52 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > Am 06.11.2013 um 20:58 schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt > : > > > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:24 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> On 05.11.2013, at 08:42, Liu Ping Fan wrote: > >> > >>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan > >> > >> Patch descript

Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/kvm: remove redundant assignment

2013-11-06 Thread Alexander Graf
Am 06.11.2013 um 20:58 schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt : > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:24 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 05.11.2013, at 08:42, Liu Ping Fan wrote: >> >>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan >> >> Patch description missing. > > Do you really need a description for trivial one-lines w

[PATCH] powerpc/85xx: don't init the mpic ipi for the SoC which has doorbell support

2013-11-06 Thread Kevin Hao
It makes no sense to initialize the mpic ipi for the SoC which has doorbell support. So set the smp_85xx_ops.probe to NULL for this case. Since the smp_85xx_ops.probe is also used in function smp_85xx_setup_cpu() to check if we need to invoke mpic_setup_this_cpu(), we introduce a new setup_cpu func

[PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/kvm: remove redundant assignment

2013-11-06 Thread Liu Ping Fan
ret is assigned twice with the same value, so remove the later one. Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan Acked-by: Paul Mackerras --- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c index db

[PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/kvm: fix rare but potential deadlock scene

2013-11-06 Thread Liu Ping Fan
Since kvmppc_hv_find_lock_hpte() is called from both virtmode and realmode, so it can trigger the deadlock. Suppose the following scene: Two physical cpuM, cpuN, two VM instances A, B, each VM has a group of vcpus. If on cpuM, vcpu_A_1 holds bitlock X (HPTE_V_HVLOCK), then is switched out, and o

Re: [PATCH V7 5/7] POWER/cpuidle: Generic POWER CPUIDLE driver supporting PSERIES.

2013-11-06 Thread Deepthi Dharwar
On 11/07/2013 10:31 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 09:45 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: >> 'powerpc' would be very generic arch and would comprise of all platforms >> including embedded 32/64 bit to server 64 bit (similar to that of ARM). >> This driver does not intend to

Re: [PATCH V7 5/7] POWER/cpuidle: Generic POWER CPUIDLE driver supporting PSERIES.

2013-11-06 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 09:45 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: > 'powerpc' would be very generic arch and would comprise of all platforms > including embedded 32/64 bit to server 64 bit (similar to that of ARM). > This driver does not intend to support complete powerpc arch, but just > PSERIES and POWER

Re: [PATCH 4/7] IBM Akebono: Add support to the OHCI platform driver for Akebono

2013-11-06 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 14:34 +1100, Alistair Popple wrote: > Thanks. Based on the discussion for the EHCI driver I would like to change > the > compatibility string to "usb-ochi" (instead of "ibm,akebono-ohci"). Are you > still happy for me to add the Acked-by with the alternate compatibility (an

Re: [PATCH V7 5/7] POWER/cpuidle: Generic POWER CPUIDLE driver supporting PSERIES.

2013-11-06 Thread Deepthi Dharwar
On 11/07/2013 02:35 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 10/29/2013 12:01 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: >> This patch includes cleanup and refactoring of the >> existing code to make the driver POWER generic. >> * Re-naming the functions from pseries to generic power. >> * Re-naming the backend driver from

Re: [PATCH 4/7] IBM Akebono: Add support to the OHCI platform driver for Akebono

2013-11-06 Thread Alistair Popple
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 10:04:02 Alan Stern wrote: [snip] > > > > + /* Platforms using DT don't always provide platform data. > > +* This should provide reasonable defaults. */ > > /* >* The accepted format for multi-line >* comments is like this. >*/ > Ok, I'll

[PATCH 2/3] powerpc/p1010rdb:update dts to adapt to both old and new p1010rdb

2013-11-06 Thread Zhao Qiang
P1010rdb-pa and p1010rdb-pb have different phy interrupts. So update dts to adapt to both p1010rdb-pa and p1010rdb-pb. Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010rdb-pa.dts | 35 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010rdb-pa_36b.dts | 58 +

[PATCH 3/3] powerpc/p1010rdb:update mtd of nand to adapt to both old and new p1010rdb

2013-11-06 Thread Zhao Qiang
P1010rdb-pa and p1010rdb-pb have different mtd of nand. So update dts to adapt to both p1010rdb-pa and p1010rdb-pb. Move the nand-mtd from p1010rdb.dtsi to p1010rdb-pa*.dts. Remove nand-mtd for p1010rdb-pb, whick will use mtdparts from u-boot instead of nand-mtd in device tree. Signed-off-by: Zha

[PATCH 1/3] powerpc/p1010rdb:add P1010RDB-PB platform support

2013-11-06 Thread Zhao Qiang
The P1010RDB-PB is similar to P1010RDB(P1010RDB-PA). So, P1010RDB-PB use the same platform file as P1010RDB. Then Add support for P1010RDB-PB platform. Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang --- arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/p1010rdb.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platform

RE: [PATCH v5 4/4] powerpc/85xx: add sysfs for pw20 state and altivec idle

2013-11-06 Thread Dongsheng Wang
> -Original Message- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 9:20 AM > To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534 > Cc: Bhushan Bharat-R65777; Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc- > d...@lists.ozlabs.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] powerpc/85xx: add sysfs for pw20 state and > altivec idle

RE: [PATCHv2 5/8] ASoC: SGTL5000: Enhance the SGTL5000 codec driver about regulator.

2013-11-06 Thread Li Xiubo
> > The SGTL5000 is based on regulators and when it is disabled, there > > will be an error returns directly while the SGTL5000 codec is probing. > > What makes you say this? > >From the code: File path: "sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c" == #ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR . #else static

Re: [PATCH 3/7] IBM Akebono: Add support for a new PHY to the IBM emac driver

2013-11-06 Thread Alistair Popple
On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 16:40:10 Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:34 +1100, Alistair Popple wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 23:11:50 Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 06:54 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > > It's an SoC bit so there's little point ma

Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/kvm: fix rare but potential deadlock scene

2013-11-06 Thread Liu ping fan
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:02:07PM +0800, Liu ping fan wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 03:42:43PM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote: >> >> Since kvmppc_hv_find_lock_hpte() is called from b

Re: [RFC PATCH] ehci-platform: Merge ppc-of EHCI driver into the ehci-platform driver

2013-11-06 Thread Alistair Popple
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 06:57:00 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 18:39 +1100, Alistair Popple wrote: [snip] > > I would go even further and add the 44x workarounds to the normal > platform device, with a compatible check in there. That isn't the > first time we add quirks to an

Re: [RFC PATCH] ehci-platform: Merge ppc-of EHCI driver into the ehci-platform driver

2013-11-06 Thread Alistair Popple
On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 11:14:44 Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 6 Nov 2013, Alistair Popple wrote: [snip] > > + /* Initialise platform data from device tree if available. */ > > + if (!dn) { > > Shouldn't this be "if (dn)"? Yep. Thanks. > > + if (of_get_property(dn, "big-endian", NULL))

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: memcpy optimization for 64bit LE

2013-11-06 Thread Michael Neuling
OK, can you add that and/or maybe antons description to the patch changelog? Mikey On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Philippe Bergheaud wrote: > Michael Neuling wrote: >> >> Philippe Bergheaud wrote: >> >> >>> Unaligned stores take alignment exceptions on POWER7 running in >>> little-endian. >>>

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: memcpy optimization for 64bit LE

2013-11-06 Thread Anton Blanchard
Hi, > > Unaligned stores take alignment exceptions on POWER7 running in > > little-endian. This is a dumb little-endian base memcpy that > > prevents unaligned stores. It is replaced by the VMX memcpy at boot. > > Is this any faster than the generic version? Once booted the feature fixup code s

[PATCH 2/4] powerpc: Set eflags correctly for ELF ABIv2 core dumps.

2013-11-06 Thread Rusty Russell
We leave it at zero (though it could be 1) for old tasks. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/elf.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/elf.h index 54c7445..8b89268 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include

[PATCH 1/4] powerpc: Add TIF_ELF2ABI flag.

2013-11-06 Thread Rusty Russell
Little endian ppc64 is getting an exciting new ABI. This is reflected by the bottom two bits of e_flags in the ELF header: 0 == legacy binaries (v1 ABI) 1 == binaries using the old ABI (compiled with a new toolchain) 2 == binaries using the new ABI. We store this in a thr

[PATCH 3/4] powerpc: ELF2 binaries launched directly.

2013-11-06 Thread Rusty Russell
No function descriptor, but we set r12 up and set TIF_RESTOREALL as it normally isn't restored on return from syscall. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell --- arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 50 ++- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/

[PATCH 4/4] powerpc: ELF2 binaries signal handling

2013-11-06 Thread Rusty Russell
For the ELFv2 ABI, the hander is the entry point, not a function descriptor. We also need to set up r12, and fortunately the fast_exception_return exit path restores r12 for us so nothing else is required. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell --- arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c | 25

Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] powerpc/85xx: add sysfs for pw20 state and altivec idle

2013-11-06 Thread Scott Wood
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 01:50 -0600, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bhushan Bharat-R65777 > > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 1:25 PM > > To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534; Wood Scott-B07421 > > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 4/4] pow

Re: [PATCH V7 7/7] powernv/cpuidle: Enable idle powernv cpu to call into the cpuidle framework.

2013-11-06 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 10/29/2013 12:02 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: This patch enables idle cpu on the powernv platform to hook on to the cpuidle framework, if available, else call on to default idle platform code. Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano --- arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/se

Re: [PATCH V7 6/7] POWER/cpuidle: Enable powernv cpuidle support.

2013-11-06 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 10/29/2013 12:01 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: The following patch extends the current power backend idle driver to the powernv platform. Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano --- drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-ibm-power.c | 39 --- 1 file ch

Re: [PATCH V7 5/7] POWER/cpuidle: Generic POWER CPUIDLE driver supporting PSERIES.

2013-11-06 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 10/29/2013 12:01 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: This patch includes cleanup and refactoring of the existing code to make the driver POWER generic. * Re-naming the functions from pseries to generic power. * Re-naming the backend driver from pseries_idle to ibm-power-idle. Signed-off-by: Deepthi

Re: [PATCH V7 4/7] pseries/cpuidle: Remove MAX_IDLE_STATE macro.

2013-11-06 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 10/29/2013 12:01 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: This patch removes the usage of MAX_IDLE_STATE macro and dead code around it. The number of states are determined at run time based on the cpuidle state table selected on a given platform Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano

Re: [PATCH V7 3/7] pseries/cpuidle: Make pseries_idle backend driver a non-module.

2013-11-06 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 10/29/2013 12:01 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: Currently pseries_idle cpuidle backend driver cannot be built as a module due to dependencies. Therefore the driver has to be built in. The dependency is around update_snooze_delay() defined in cpuidle driver and called from kernel/sysfs.c. This patc

Re: [PATCH V7 2/7] pseries/cpuidle: Use cpuidle_register() for initialisation.

2013-11-06 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 10/29/2013 12:01 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: This patch replaces the cpuidle driver and devices initialisation calls with a single generic cpuidle_register() call and also includes minor refactoring of the code around it. Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano --- driv

Re: [PATCH V7 1/7] pseries/cpuidle: Move processor_idle.c to drivers/cpuidle.

2013-11-06 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 10/29/2013 12:01 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: Move the file from arch specific pseries/processor_idle.c to drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-ibm-power.c Make the relevant Makefile and Kconfig changes. This will enable having a common backend cpuidle driver for POWER platform going forward. Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/kvm: remove redundant assignment

2013-11-06 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:24 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 05.11.2013, at 08:42, Liu Ping Fan wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan > > Patch description missing. Do you really need a description for trivial one-lines whose subject is a perfectly complete description already ? > Please

Re: [RFC PATCH] ehci-platform: Merge ppc-of EHCI driver into the ehci-platform driver

2013-11-06 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 18:39 +1100, Alistair Popple wrote: > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/sequoia.dts > b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/sequoia.dts > index b1d3292..e28371e 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/sequoia.dts > +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/sequoia.dts > @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ >

Re: [RFC] arch: Introduce new TSO memory barrier smp_tmb()

2013-11-06 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:48:48AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > A few nits on Documentation/memory-barriers.txt and some pointless > comments elsewhere. With the suggested Documentation/memory-barriers.txt > fixes: > > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney Thanks, I think I'll cut the thing into a

Re: [RFC] arch: Introduce new TSO memory barrier smp_tmb()

2013-11-06 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:57:36PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:51:10PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > This is screaming for a default implementation in asm-generic. > > Right you are... how about a little something like this? > > There's a few archs I didn't fu

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] powerpc/embedded6xx: Add support for Motorola/Emerson MVME5100

2013-11-06 Thread Alessio Igor Bogani
On lun, 2013-11-04 at 08:07 +1100, Stephen Chivers wrote: > Add support for the Motorola/Emerson MVME5100 Single Board Computer. > > The MVME5100 is a 6U form factor VME64 computer with: > > - A single MPC7410 or MPC750 CPU > - A HAWK Processor Host Bridge (CPU to PCI) and >

Re: [PATCH 3/7] IBM Akebono: Add support for a new PHY to the IBM emac driver

2013-11-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:34 +1100, Alistair Popple wrote: > On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 23:11:50 Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 06:54 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > [snip] > > > > It's an SoC bit so there's little point making it generally > > > selectable by the user. > > > > I

Re: [RFC PATCH] ehci-platform: Merge ppc-of EHCI driver into the ehci-platform driver

2013-11-06 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 6 Nov 2013, Alistair Popple wrote: > Currently the ppc-of driver uses the compatibility string > "usb-ehci". This means platforms that use device-tree and implement an > EHCI compatible interface have to either use the ppc-of driver or add > a compatible line to the ehci-platform driver. I

Re: [RFC] arch: Introduce new TSO memory barrier smp_tmb()

2013-11-06 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:51:10PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > This is screaming for a default implementation in asm-generic. Right you are... how about a little something like this? There's a few archs I didn't fully merge with the generic one because of weird nop implementations. asm vo

Re: [RFC] arch: Introduce new TSO memory barrier smp_tmb()

2013-11-06 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 157 > +- > arch/alpha/include/asm/barrier.h | 15 +++ > arch/arc/include/asm/barrier.h| 15 +++ > arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h| 15 +++ >

Re: [RFC] arch: Introduce new TSO memory barrier smp_tmb()

2013-11-06 Thread Peter Zijlstra
Subject: arch: Introduce smp_load_acquire(), smp_store_release() From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 20:18:11 +0100 A number of situations currently require the heavyweight smp_mb(), even though there is no need to order prior stores against later loads. Many architectures have much chea

Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/kvm: remove redundant assignment

2013-11-06 Thread Alexander Graf
On 05.11.2013, at 08:42, Liu Ping Fan wrote: > Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan Patch description missing. Please add Paul's ack in the next revision of this patch :). Alex > --- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3

Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/kvm: fix rare but potential deadlock scene

2013-11-06 Thread Paul Mackerras
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:02:07PM +0800, Liu ping fan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 03:42:43PM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote: > >> Since kvmppc_hv_find_lock_hpte() is called from both virtmode and > >> realmode, so it can trigger the deadlo

Re: [RFC] arch: Introduce new TSO memory barrier smp_tmb()

2013-11-06 Thread Will Deacon
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 06:49:43PM +, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 02:05:48PM +, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > + > > > > +#define smp_store_release(p, v) > > > > \ > > > > +do {

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: memcpy optimization for 64bit LE

2013-11-06 Thread Philippe Bergheaud
Michael Neuling wrote: Philippe Bergheaud wrote: Unaligned stores take alignment exceptions on POWER7 running in little-endian. This is a dumb little-endian base memcpy that prevents unaligned stores. It is replaced by the VMX memcpy at boot. Is this any faster than the generic version?

Re: [PATCHv2 5/8] ASoC: SGTL5000: Enhance the SGTL5000 codec driver about regulator.

2013-11-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:59:53AM +, Li Xiubo wrote: Please fix your mailer to word wrap within paragraphs. > The SGTL5000 is based on regulators and when it is disabled, there > will be an error returns directly while the SGTL5000 codec is probing. What makes you say this? That's not how

Re: [PATCHv2 1/8] ALSA: Add SAI SoC Digital Audio Interface driver.

2013-11-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 03:21:49AM +, Li Xiubo wrote: > As your opinions, should I move the four register writing operations to > .set_sysclk/set_clkdiv/... functions too ? > Or just add a clk_disable_unprepare() after them here, and then add > clk_prepare_enable in one of .set_sysclk/set_cl

[PATCH V6 2/2] powerpc/85xx: Add TWR-P1025 board support

2013-11-06 Thread Xie Xiaobo
TWR-P1025 Overview - 512Mbyte DDR3 (on board DDR) 64MB Nor Flash eTSEC1: Connected to RGMII PHY AR8035 eTSEC3: Connected to RGMII PHY AR8035 Two USB2.0 Type A One microSD Card slot One mini-PCIe slot One mini-USB TypeB dual UART Signed-off-by: Michael Johnston Signed-off-

[PATCH V6 1/2] powerpc/85xx: Add QE common init function

2013-11-06 Thread Xie Xiaobo
Define a QE init function in common file, and avoid the same codes being duplicated in board files. Signed-off-by: Xie Xiaobo --- V6 -> V5: add of_device_is_available check. V5 -> V4: add the board files modification, remove the qe_pic_init. V4 -> V3: Nochange arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common

RE: [PATCHv2 1/8] ALSA: Add SAI SoC Digital Audio Interface driver.

2013-11-06 Thread Li Xiubo
> > > >> If there are any comments that say PPC but are not PPC-specific, > that > > > >> >should be fixed. > > > > Yes, find it. > > > > > > > > The comments is in "sound/soc/fsl/Makefile" : > > > > +++ > > > > "# Freescale PowerPC SSI/DMA Platform Support" > > > > --- > > > > > >

RE: [PATCHv2 5/8] ASoC: SGTL5000: Enhance the SGTL5000 codec driver about regulator.

2013-11-06 Thread Li Xiubo
> > On VF610 series there are no regulators used, and now whether the > > CONFIG_REGULATOR mirco is enabled or not, for the VF610 audio patch > > series, the board cannot be probe successfully. > > And this patch will solve this issue. > > I don't understand what this is for at all, you're just sa

Re: [PATCHv2 1/8] ALSA: Add SAI SoC Digital Audio Interface driver.

2013-11-06 Thread Shawn Guo
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:53:24AM +, Li Xiubo wrote: > > >> If there are any comments that say PPC but are not PPC-specific, that > > >> >should be fixed. > > > Yes, find it. > > > > > > The comments is in "sound/soc/fsl/Makefile" : > > > +++ > > > "# Freescale PowerPC SSI/DMA Platform