Re: visible memory seems wrong in kexec crash dump kernel

2013-07-13 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 14:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > >Is this expected behaviour? It seems to be the same in current git > > >versions of kexec-tools. > > > > > >On my system I see "/proc/device-tree/memory". > > > > > >If I modify add_usable_mem_property() to also accept "/memory" then >

Re: visible memory seems wrong in kexec crash dump kernel

2013-07-13 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:30:50AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 07/12/2013 04:59 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > >On 07/12/2013 03:08 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > > > >>I turned on the instrumentation in early_init_dt_scan_memory() and got > >>the following when jumping to the capture kernel: > >> > >

Re: [PATCH RFC 5/8] dma: mpc512x: use symbolic specifiers for DMA channels

2013-07-13 Thread Gerhard Sittig
[ MPC8308 knowledge required, see below ] On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 09:17 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 12 July 2013, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/dma/mpc512x-dma.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ > > +/* > > + * This header file provides symbolic specifiers for DMA channels

Re: visible memory seems wrong in kexec crash dump kernel

2013-07-13 Thread Chris Friesen
On 07/12/2013 04:59 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: On 07/12/2013 03:08 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: I turned on the instrumentation in early_init_dt_scan_memory() and got the following when jumping to the capture kernel: memory scan node memory, reg size 16, data: 0 0 2 0, - 0 , 2 That 0x20

Re: [PATCH RFC 5/8] dma: mpc512x: use symbolic specifiers for DMA channels

2013-07-13 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 12 July 2013, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/dma/mpc512x-dma.h > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ > +/* > + * This header file provides symbolic specifiers for DMA channels > + * within the MPC512x SoC's DMA controller. Since requester lines > + * directly map to channel numbers and n