It is often useful to see the instruction that caused an unhandled
exception.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard
---
We print all ones if the get_user fails, do we want to go to
the added effort of printing like we do in the oops
code?
Index: b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
On 31 May 2013 16:20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20 May 2013 10:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 13 May 2013 11:34, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> On 22 April 2013 12:19, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 9 April 2013 14:05, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 5 April 2013 12:16, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 4 April
> -Original Message-
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [mailto:b...@kernel.crashing.org]
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 12:47 PM
> To: Zang Roy-R61911
> Cc: Timur Tabi; Xie Shaohui-B21989; Liu Qiang-B32616; tiejun.chen;
> Fleming Andy-AFLEMING; Bhushan Bharat-R65777; linuxppc-
> d...@lists.oz
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 04:45 +, Zang Roy-R61911 wrote:
>
> > Forget it, reset all the jumpers to the default setup (found the doc !)
> > and they come up now in slot 4 and 7. It also looks like uBoot now has an
> > e1000 driver so I don't have to use fman (for which I believe there is
> > still
> -Original Message-
> From: Linuxppc-dev [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+tie-
> fei.zang=freescale@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Benjamin
> Herrenschmidt
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 12:40 PM
> To: Timur Tabi
> Cc: Xie Shaohui-B21989; Liu Qiang-B32616; Zang Roy-R61911; tiejun.chen;
>
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 13:52 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> So I got the rev2 chip today, put it in, and PCI-E is still not getting
> a link. Since the LEDs of the e1000 aren't coming up at all, I *suspect*
> the slots are getting no power.
>
> Is there a power control somewhere ? Maybe so
Scott Wood writes:
> On 04/28/2013 02:37:30 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
>>
>> We will be switching PMD_SHIFT to 24 bits to facilitate THP
>> impmenetation.
>> With PMD_SHIFT set to 24, we now have 16MB huge pages allocated at
>> PGD level.
>> That means with 32 b
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 09:56 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> >> 3) run " pix altbak" command
> >>
> >> 4) check you are on bank4
> >
> > It stays on bank 0
>
> pix altbank
So I got the rev2 chip today, put it in, and PCI-E is still not
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:42:03AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/01/2013 07:07:20 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 09:47:16PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> >wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 18:59 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >>
> >> > The effect of this change is that the isa_io_b
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:39:45AM -0400, Robert Knight wrote:
>On 06/06/2013 07:32 AM, Brian King wrote:
>>On 06/05/2013 04:14 PM, Robert Knight wrote:
>>>On 6/3/2013 11:52 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:16:52PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:40:52P
Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 06/06/2013 10:26 AM, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >
> >> Completely ignore BHRB privilege state filter request as we are
> >> already configuring that with privilege state filtering attribute
> >> for the accompanying PMU event. This would
On 04/28/2013 02:37:30 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
We will be switching PMD_SHIFT to 24 bits to facilitate THP
impmenetation.
With PMD_SHIFT set to 24, we now have 16MB huge pages allocated at
PGD level.
That means with 32 bit process we cannot allocate normal page
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 06:45:37 -0700
> On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 00:26 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Andy Lutomirski
>> Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 22:38:26 -0700
>>
>> > I broke them in this commit:
>> >
>> > commit 1be374a0518a288147c6a7398792583200a67261
>> > Author
On 06/06/2013 04:42:44 AM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:
> > > This looks like a bit much for 3.10 (certainly, subject lines
like
> > > "refactor" and "enhance" and "add support" aren't going to make
> > Linus
> > > happy given that we're past rc4) so I think we should apply
> > > http://
On Thu 06 Jun 2013 04:07:18 AM CST, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> From: Gu Zheng
>>
>> Use the new pci_alloc_dev(bus) to replace the existing using of
>> alloc_pci_dev(void).
>> ...
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index
lwepx faults needs to be handled by KVM. With the current solution
the host kernel searches for the faulting address using its LPID context.
If a host translation is found we return to the lwepx instr instead of the
fixup ending up in an infinite loop.
Revert the commit 1d628af7 "add load inst fix
lwepx faults needs to be handled by KVM and this implies additional code
in DO_KVM macro to identify the source of the exception originated in
host context. This requires to check the Exception Syndrome Register
(ESR[EPID]) and External PID Load Context Register (EPLC[EGS]) for DTB_MISS,
DSI and LR
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 00:26 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andy Lutomirski
> Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 22:38:26 -0700
>
> > I broke them in this commit:
> >
> > commit 1be374a0518a288147c6a7398792583200a67261
> > Author: Andy Lutomirski
> > Date: Wed May 22 14:07:44 2013 -0700
>
On 06/06/2013 07:32 AM, Brian King wrote:
On 06/05/2013 04:14 PM, Robert Knight wrote:
On 6/3/2013 11:52 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:16:52PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:40:52PM -0400, Robert Knight wrote:
On 6/3/2013 8:01 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
O
On 06/05/2013 04:14 PM, Robert Knight wrote:
> On 6/3/2013 11:52 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:16:52PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:40:52PM -0400, Robert Knight wrote:
On 6/3/2013 8:01 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:20:
> > > This looks like a bit much for 3.10 (certainly, subject lines like
> > > "refactor" and "enhance" and "add support" aren't going to make
> > Linus
> > > happy given that we're past rc4) so I think we should apply
> > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/242896/ for 3.10. Then for 3.11,
> > >
From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 22:38:26 -0700
> I broke them in this commit:
>
> commit 1be374a0518a288147c6a7398792583200a67261
> Author: Andy Lutomirski
> Date: Wed May 22 14:07:44 2013 -0700
>
> net: Block MSG_CMSG_COMPAT in send(m)msg and recv(m)msg
>
>
On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:35:47 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
wrote:
> Andrew Morton writes:
>
> > On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:31:06 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 20:58 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >> >
> >> > This is the second patchset needed to support THP
I broke them in this commit:
commit 1be374a0518a288147c6a7398792583200a67261
Author: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Wed May 22 14:07:44 2013 -0700
net: Block MSG_CMSG_COMPAT in send(m)msg and recv(m)msg
This patch adds __sys_sendmsg and __sys_sendmsg as common helpers that accept
M
24 matches
Mail list logo
