On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 09:47:16PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 18:59 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
>
> > The effect of this change is that the isa_io_base will be 0 and the IO
> > resource are equal to the virtual address of the IO space. But the IO
> > functions such as
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:34:27PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> On context switch, we should have no prefetch streams leak from one
> userspace process to another. This frees up prefetch resources for the
> next process.
>
> Based on patch from Milton Miller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Neulin
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 03:44:07PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 22:14 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 05:30:41PM +0800, Chen Yuanquan-B41889 wrote:
> > > On 05/29/2013 01:35 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > >bios_add_device(). Drop explicit call
All these boards use the same configuration file p1_p2_rdb_pc.h in
u-boot. So they have the same pci bus address set by the u-boot.
But in some of these boards the bus address set in dtb don't match
the one used by u-boot. And this will trigger a kernel bug in 32bit
kernel and cause the pci device
On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 18:59 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> The effect of this change is that the isa_io_base will be 0 and the IO
> resource are equal to the virtual address of the IO space. But the IO
> functions such as outx/inx should work as well. This is why I ask the
> above question. What do you
On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 21:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 04:33:24PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
> >
> > If a hash bucket gets full, we "evict" a more/less random entry from it.
> > When we do that we don't invalidate the TLB (hpte_remove
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 04:33:24PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
>
> If a hash bucket gets full, we "evict" a more/less random entry from it.
> When we do that we don't invalidate the TLB (hpte_remove) because we assume
> the old translation is still technically "valid
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 06:27:21PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 05/31/2013 01:43:49 AM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:54:59PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 05/30/2013 05:20:34 AM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >> >On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 05:52:09PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> >> On 05/2
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:11:20PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 14:41 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > Could you shed some light on this issue? Do we really has the restriction
> > that we have to pick one bus controller as primary even there is no
> > IS
On 06/01/2013 10:59 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 17 May 2013 10:59:17 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> This patch removes the Kconfig symbol HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN from
>> arch/{arm,powerpc}
>> and allowing compilation unconditionally on all arm and powerpc platforms.
>>
>> This brings a bigger compi
On Friday 17 May 2013 10:59:17 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> This patch removes the Kconfig symbol HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN from arch/{arm,powerpc}
> and allowing compilation unconditionally on all arm and powerpc platforms.
>
> This brings a bigger compile time coverage and removes the following
> dependen
On 06/01/2013 01:40 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 18:06 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 05/17/2013 11:09 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:59:17AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
This patch removes the Kconfig symbol HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN from
>>
12 matches
Mail list logo
