From: Wei Yongjun
Add the missing unlock on the error handling path in function
hvcs_initialize().
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun
---
drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
index cab5c7a..744c3b8
> -Original Message-
> From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:ba...@ti.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM
> To: Simon Haggett
> Cc: Li Yang-R58472; Felipe Balbi; Greg Kroah-Hartman; linux-
> u...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; Laurent Pin
The root node path must be internally converted to "/", or various
pieces of code looking for it that way will fail. The code to do
that however had a bug where we might incorrectly append pieces
of the original path from the fdt to the "/".
We should probably add a proper dedicated accessor for t
OPAL provides the firmware base/entry in registers at boot time
for debugging purposes. We had a bug in the code trying to stash
these into the appropriate kernel globals (a line of code was
probably dropped by accident back when this was merged)
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
---
arch/po
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 18:35 +0300, Robert Berger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/18/2012 10:03 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > Which looks correct. So this might be something specific to ELDK ?
>
> I just tried with the ELDK 5.2.1 and have exactly the same behavior as
> with ELDK 4.2, so I gues
Hi,
On 10/18/2012 10:03 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> Which looks correct. So this might be something specific to ELDK ?
I just tried with the ELDK 5.2.1 and have exactly the same behavior as
with ELDK 4.2, so I guess there is something not correct in
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_msi.c.
J
Hi,
On 10/18/2012 10:03 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> Which looks correct. So this might be something specific to ELDK ?
I just tried with the ELDK 5.2.1 and have exactly the same behavior as
with ELDK 4.2, so I guess there is something not correct in
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_msi.c.
Ju
From: Julia Lawall
The function initialize_flash_pde_data is only called four times. All four
calls are in the function rtas_flash_init, and on the failure of any of the
calls, remove_flash_pde is called on the third argument of each of the
calls. There is thus no need for initialize_flash_pde_
Pong. ;-)
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:03:31PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 14:22 +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Following up on the old discussion, I talked briefly about this
> > issue with BenH at the kernel summit. The outcome basically is that
> > it's a bit sa
