On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 15:52 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> On 05/17/2012 09:58 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 12:01 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> >> This patch tries to fix following lockdep complaints:
> >
> > .../...
> >
> >> pseries_notify_cpu_idle_add_cpu() actual
setting CONFIG_IRQ_ALL_CPUS distributes IRQs to CPUs only when
the number of online CPUs equals NR_CPUS. See commit
280ff97494e0fef4124bee5c52e39b23a18dd283 "sparc64: fix and
optimize irq distribution" for more details.
Using the online mask fixes IRQ-to-CPU distribution on systems
that boot with
MTD_OF_PARTS and the default setting is not working due to using 'Y'
instead of 'y', introduced in commit
d6137badeff1ef64b4e0092ec249ebdeaeb3ff37. This made our board, and
possibly other boards using DTS defined partitions and not having
CONFIG_MTD_OF_PARTS=y defined in the defconfig, fail to moun
Scott Wood wrote:
> Regardless of the config that shows this, the MSR[GS] check should go
> away. If you have a /hypervisor node, you already know you're a guest.
Fair enough.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing
On 05/17/2012 01:44 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> powerpc randconfig
>
> Doesn't this generate a different .config every time it's run? Do I keep
> generating random .config files until the problem shows up?
>
Regardless of the config that shows this, the MSR[GS] check sh
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> powerpc randconfig
Doesn't this generate a different .config every time it's run? Do I keep
generating random .config files until the problem shows up?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
___
Linuxppc-dev mai
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> + arch/powerpc/platforms/512x/mpc512x_shared.c: error: 'enum
>> fsl_diu_monitor_port' declared inside parameter list [-Werror]: =>
>> 70:9, 84:9, 88:36
>> + arch/powerpc/platforms/512x/mpc512x_shared.c: error: 'return' with
>> a value, in function returning void
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
>
>> Anyway, I think I see what the problem is, but it does appear when I use
>> the normal defconfigs. What .config was being used?
>
> I meant to say that it does NOT appear.
powerp
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Anyway, I think I see what the problem is, but it does appear when I use
> the normal defconfigs. What .config was being used?
I meant to say that it does NOT appear.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
__
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Thanks. These are all freescale platforms, the relevant people should be
> already but I've added Scott and Kumar to the CC list just in case.
Seeing how this is my code, I'd say the relevant people were not CC'd. :-)
Anyway, I think I see what the problem is, but
Greetings.
I was occasionally running into problems at boot time on an
MPC8315-based board (derived from the MPC831xRDB, apparently), using
SATA to talk to an SSD. My vendor suggested that I enable
CONFIG_MPC8315_DS.
That symbol is only found once in the entire kernel codebase:
$ git checkou
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Robert Berger
wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 09:28 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:01:55PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I've asked Tony to have a look at splitting the build decision
>>> in arch/powerpc/boot along the same lines as th
On 05/17/2012 09:58 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 12:01 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
>> This patch tries to fix following lockdep complaints:
>
> .../...
>
>> pseries_notify_cpu_idle_add_cpu() actually does
>> cpuidle_disable_device(), and then cpuidle_enable_device(), whi
13 matches
Mail list logo
