Arshad, Farrukh wrote:
> I have dumped TLB entries while mapping shared memory. On both cores M-Bit
> (MAS2[61]) is set in TLB0 entries. On both cores M-Bit is set for all valid
> TLB1 entries. TLB1 does contains some invalid entries which has M-Bit
> cleared. So I believe at this time the coher
Hi,
What will give me access to the RTC hardware on an old PowerMac 8600?
I modload rtc-generic. /proc/devices has:
254 rtc
and ls -l /dev/rtc*:
crw-r--r-- 2 root root 254, 0 Sep 2 2010 /dev/rtc
crw-r--r-- 2 root root 254, 0 Sep 2 2010 /dev/rtc0
crw-r--r-- 1 root root 10, 135 Aug 10
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 05:44:05PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> * Grant Likely | 2012-01-27 14:36:16 [-0700]:
>>
>> >This patch removes the x86-specific definition of irq_domain and replaces
>> >it with the common implementation.
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 05:44:05PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Grant Likely | 2012-01-27 14:36:16 [-0700]:
>
> >This patch removes the x86-specific definition of irq_domain and replaces
> >it with the common implementation.
>
> I pulled your devicetree/next tree. After this patch
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:13:41AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 01/23/2012 01:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Documentation for irq_domain library which will be created in subsequent
> > patches.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely
> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner
> > --
On 01/27/2012 03:35 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> This patch series is ready for much wider consumption now. I'd like
> to get it into linux-next ASAP because there will be ARM board support
> depending on it. I'll wait a few days before I ask Stephen to pull
> this in.
>
> Stephe
On 01/27/2012 01:35 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Documentation for irq_domain library which will be created in subsequent
> patches.
I posted a lot of comments to v2 on Jan. 24.
Looks like they were ignored.
Please see http://marc.info/?l=linuxppc-embedded&m=132742951211808&w=2
> Signed-off-by: G
* Grant Likely | 2012-01-27 14:36:16 [-0700]:
>This patch removes the x86-specific definition of irq_domain and replaces
>it with the common implementation.
I pulled your devicetree/next tree. After this patch I get:
|Hierarchical RCU implementation.
|NR_IRQS:2304 nr_irqs:256 16
|[ c
