Re: hvc_console: Don't access hvc_task if not initialised

2011-04-26 Thread Amit Shah
On (Wed) 27 Apr 2011 [14:31:29], Rusty Russell wrote: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:36:10 +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > On (Wed) 20 Apr 2011 [07:34:35], Greg KH wrote: > > > Care to either create this patch, or resend your original one, if you > > > want it applied? > > > > Rusty has the other one queue

Re: hvc_console: Don't access hvc_task if not initialised

2011-04-26 Thread Rusty Russell
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:36:10 +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > On (Wed) 20 Apr 2011 [07:34:35], Greg KH wrote: > > Care to either create this patch, or resend your original one, if you > > want it applied? > > Rusty has the other one queued. I pinged him about status. It's merged, but I don't think it

[PATCH] powerpc/85xx: add host-pci(e) bridge only for RC

2011-04-26 Thread Prabhakar Kushwaha
FSL PCIe controller can act as agent(EP) or host(RC). Under Agent(EP) mode they are configured via Host. So it is not required to add with the PCI(e) sub-system. Add and configure PCIe controller only for RC mode. Signed-off-by: Vivek Mahajan Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha --- Based upon g

linux-next: ibmveth runtime errors

2011-04-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, For the last couple of days, linux-next booting on a few of our Power partitions (but not all) have produced this error (over and over): ibmveth 300b: eth0: tx: h_send_logical_lan failed with rc=-4 Linus' tree seems to boot fine on these partitions. The only commit directly affectin

Re: device not available because of BAR 0 collisions

2011-04-26 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 09:38 -0400, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 04/25/2011 08:01 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:10 -0400, Steven A. Falco wrote: > >> I'm getting an error message when trying to talk to some custom > >> hardware: > >> > >> dx83xx 0001:43:00.0: device n

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/kexec: Fix build failure on 32-bit SMP

2011-04-26 Thread Paul Gortmaker
On 11-04-24 09:04 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Commit b987812b3fcaf70fdf0037589e5d2f5f2453e6ce left > crash_kexec_wait_realmode() undefined for UP. > > Commit 7c7a81b53e581d727d069cc45df5510516faac31 defined it for UP but > left it undefined for 32-bit SMP. Crap, I'd originally tested it for 32-SM

Re: [PATCH 11/14] PM / AVR32: Use struct syscore_ops instead of sysdevs for PM

2011-04-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, April 26, 2011, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: > On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 23:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Convert some AVR32 architecture's code to using struct syscore_ops > > objects for power management instead of sysdev classes and sysdevs. >

Re: [PATCH 11/14] PM / AVR32: Use struct syscore_ops instead of sysdevs for PM

2011-04-26 Thread Hans-Christian Egtvedt
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 23:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Convert some AVR32 architecture's code to using struct syscore_ops > objects for power management instead of sysdev classes and sysdevs. > > This simplifies the code and reduces the kernel's memory footprin

Re: device not available because of BAR 0 collisions

2011-04-26 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 04/25/2011 08:01 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:10 -0400, Steven A. Falco wrote: >> I'm getting an error message when trying to talk to some custom >> hardware: >> >> dx83xx 0001:43:00.0: device not available because of BAR 0 >> [0xa100-0xa1ff] collisions >>

[PATCH] powerpc/44x: Add multiple chip select support to NDFC driver

2011-04-26 Thread Felix Radensky
This patch extends NDFC driver to support all 4 chip selects available in NDFC NAND controller. Tested on custom 460EX board with 2 chip select NAND device. Signed-off-by: Felix Radensky --- I'd appreciate some testing on 44x boards with multiple NAND devices, like bamboo or DU440, as I don't ha