As specified by errata eTSEC49 of MPC8548 and errata eTSEC12 of MPC83xx,
older revisions of gianfar controllers will be unable to calculate a TCP/UDP
packet checksum for some alignments of the appropriate FCB. This patch checks
for FCB alignment on such controllers and falls back to software checks
I am out of the office until 08/02/2011.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Linuxppc-dev Digest,
Vol 77, Issue 92" sent on 27/1/11 20:32:14.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
___
Linuxppc-d
> > -
> gfar_tx_checksum(skb, fcb);
> > + switch
> (unlikely(gfar_has_errata(priv, GFAR_ERRATA_12))
> > +
> ? 1 : 0) {
>
> The switch construction is quite bizarre. ;-) Why not
>
My testing shows that even on broken chips unaligned packets are quite rare
(only some SYN p
On 01/20/2011 09:50 AM, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Meador Inge [mailto:meador_i...@mentor.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 6:08 PM
To: Yoder Stuart-B08248
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; devicetree-
disc...@lists.ozlabs.org; Blanchar
Please CC: netdev on future submissions of this patch, otherwise I
won't see it in my queue.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
memblock_enforce_memory_limit() takes the desired maximum quantity of memory
to end up with, not an address above which memory will not be used.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c |2 +-
arch/powerpc/mm/init_32.c |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions
On 01/27/2011 12:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:57:39 -0800
David Daney wrote:
On 01/27/2011 04:12 AM, Coly Li wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h
index 065c590..10889a6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h
+++ b/arch/pow
max_mapnr is a pfn, not an index innto mem_map[]. So don't add
ARCH_PFN_OFFSET a second time.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood
---
Ran into trouble with this when working on some KVM code.
arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-book3e.h |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-book3e.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-book3e.h
index 8eaed
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:57:39 -0800
David Daney wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 04:12 AM, Coly Li wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h
> > index 065c590..10889a6 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h
> > @
Why not also CC the PPC maintainers as well? I am not certain, but I
think they may be reached at:
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
On 01/27/2011 04:12 AM, Coly Li wrote:
Current BUG_ON() arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h does not use unlikely(),
in order to get better branch predict result, sourc
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:32:19AM +0200, Felix Radensky wrote:
> Hi Ira,
>
> On 01/25/2011 06:29 PM, Ira W. Snyder wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 04:32:02PM +0200, Felix Radensky wrote:
> >> Hi Ira,
> >>
> >> On 01/25/2011 02:18 AM, Ira W. Snyder wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:39:39A
(This patch is intended to be folded into the patch in -mm:
powerpc-introduce-little-endian-bitops.patch)
The little-endian bitops on powerpc are written as preprocessor
macros with the cast to "unsigned long *".
This means that even non-pointers will be accepted without an error, and
that is a Ve
Hello Alex,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:14:21AM -0800, Alex Dubov wrote:
> As specified by errata eTSEC49 of MPC8548 and errata eTSEC12 of MPC83xx,
> older revisions of gianfar controllers will be unable to calculate a TCP/UDP
> packet checksum for some aligments of the appropriate FCB. This patch
Hi Ira,
On 01/25/2011 06:29 PM, Ira W. Snyder wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 04:32:02PM +0200, Felix Radensky wrote:
Hi Ira,
On 01/25/2011 02:18 AM, Ira W. Snyder wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:39:39AM +0200, Felix Radensky wrote:
Hi Ira, Scott
On 01/25/2011 12:26 AM, Ira W. Snyder wrote
As specified by errata eTSEC49 of MPC8548 and errata eTSEC12 of MPC83xx,
older revisions of gianfar controllers will be unable to calculate a TCP/UDP
packet checksum for some aligments of the appropriate FCB. This patch checks
for FCB alignment on such controllers and falls back to software checksu
16 matches
Mail list logo