RE: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

> -Original Message- > From: David Daney [mailto:dda...@caviumnetworks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 9:18 AM > To: Stephen Neuendorffer > Cc: mich...@ellerman.id.au; LKML; linux-mips; > microblaze-ucli...@itee.uq.edu.au; devicetree- > disc...@lists.ozlabs.org; linuxppc-dev li

Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:03:33AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Hi all, > > There were some murmurings on IRC last week about renaming the of_*() > routines. I was procrastinating at the time and said I'd have a look at > it, so here I am. > > The thinking is that on many platforms that use t

Re: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:18 AM, David Daney wrote: > On 11/24/2010 09:02 AM, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote: >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+stephen=neuendorffer.n...@lists.ozlabs.org >>> [mailto:linuxppc-dev- >>> bounces+stephen=neuendorffer.n...@lists.ozlabs.org

Re: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

On 11/24/2010 09:02 AM, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote: -Original Message- From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+stephen=neuendorffer.n...@lists.ozlabs.org [mailto:linuxppc-dev- bounces+stephen=neuendorffer.n...@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Michael Ellerman Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 6:04

RE: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

> -Original Message- > From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+stephen=neuendorffer.n...@lists.ozlabs.org > [mailto:linuxppc-dev- > bounces+stephen=neuendorffer.n...@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Michael > Ellerman > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 6:04 AM > To: LKML > Cc: linux-mips; microblaze

Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

On 11/24/2010 06:03 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: Hi all, There were some murmurings on IRC last week about renaming the of_*() routines. I was procrastinating at the time and said I'd have a look at it, so here I am. The thinking is that on many platforms that use the of_() routines OpenFirmware

Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Personally I'm a bit ambivalent about it, the OF name is a bit wrong so > it would be nice to get rid of, but it's a lot of churn. > > So I'm hoping people with either say "YES this is a great idea", or "NO > this is stupid". Well, my vo

RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

Hi all, There were some murmurings on IRC last week about renaming the of_*() routines. I was procrastinating at the time and said I'd have a look at it, so here I am. The thinking is that on many platforms that use the of_() routines OpenFirmware is not involved at all, this is true even on many

RE: ucc_geth: transmit queue timeout at half-duplex mode

>Subject: ucc_geth: transmit queue timeout at half-duplex mode > >Hi all, >on my MPC8321E with linux-2.6.36 I get this netdev watchdog warning >"NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (of:ucc_geth): transmit queue 0 timed out" if the >link mode is half-duplex. >The warning is caused, because all Tx BDs are full and

RE: [PATCH v1] ppc44x:PHY fixup for USB on canyonlands board

On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 10:25 +0530, Rupjyoti Sarmah wrote: > > So, do you suggest to move this macro to the canyonlands.c ? Or > introduce > canyonlands.h ? Just move it to the .c file. Cheers, Ben. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozl