From: Ian Munsie
The perf userspace tool included some architecture specific code to map
registers from the DWARF register number into the names used by the regs
and stack access API.
This patch moves the architecture specific code out into a separate
arch/x86 directory along with the infrastruc
Here's the 4th version of the perf probe PowerPC support and perf arch specific
infrastructure patches rebased on top of tip/perf/core.
Changelog V4:
* Rebased on top of tip/perf/core (with powerpc/next merged) and resolved merge
conflicts.
* Move the check for DWARF support prior to the inclus
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
> Message-ID:
> R
(Mostly defconfig updates, but a few minor bug fixes).
The following changes since commit 01bf0b64579ead8a82e7cfc32ae44bc667e7ad0f:
Linus Torvalds (1):
Linux 2.6.34-rc5
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git merge
Anto
On Apr 15, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> to enable the storage controller on earlier rev. mpc834x itx boards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips
> ---
> arch/powerpc/configs/mpc83xx_defconfig |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
applied to merge.
- k
___
On Apr 15, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> a recent fc11 udev update on an 83xx board made root console login
> disappear:
>
> Updating : udev-141-8.fc11.ppc32/83
> udev: starting version 141
> udev: deprecated sysfs layout; update the kernel or
On Apr 12, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Becky Bruce wrote:
> The code was looking for this in cpu_features, not mmu_features. Fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce
> ---
> Switched to mmu_has_feature.
>
> arch/powerpc/mm/fsl_booke_mmu.c |4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions
On Apr 16, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Currently some MPC85xx and MPC86xx boards fail to build without
> CONFIG_PCI:
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/fsl_uli1575.c: In function 'quirk_final_uli5249':
> arch/powerpc/platforms/fsl_uli1575.c:234: error: implicit declaration of
> function
On Apr 3, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Wolfgang Ocker wrote:
> Some board setup functions call cpm1_clk_setup() or cmp2_clk_setup()
> to configure the clock source.
>
> If CPM_CLK_RTX has been used for the parameter mode,
> the clock has been configured only for TX but not for RX.
>
> With this patch CPM_
On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> 83xx users looking to run apache will experience this error:
>
> /var/log/apache2/error.log:
> [emerg] (38)Function not implemented: Couldn't create pollset in child; check
> system or user limits
>
> enabling CONFIG_EPOLL in kernel config fix
On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> 83xx boards typically have the DS1307 or DS1374:
>
> git grep RTC_DRV arch/powerpc/configs/*83* | grep "=y"
> arch/powerpc/configs/83xx/asp8347_defconfig:CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1374=y
> arch/powerpc/configs/83xx/mpc8313_rdb_defconfig:CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Apr 18, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Li Yang wrote:
>
>> On 4/19/2010 10:40 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 15:34 +0800, Li Yang wrote:
>>>
From: Zhao Chenhui
In fsl_of_msi_probe(), the virt_msir's chip_data have
In message <1271688543.1488.253.ca...@laptop> you wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 07:34 +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > > Are there any numbers available on how much they gain? It might be worth
> > > to stick in real numbers instead of this alleged 15%.
> >
> > I get some gain numbers but obviou
Hi,
>From reading the code (kernel/irq stuffs), it seems that at least some
handle_edge_irq based interrupts are not replayed when enabling if
desc->chip->retrigger == NULL and on a platform where
CONFIG_HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND is not set (which for now is only defined for
(some?) arm and avr32). Depen
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 07:34 +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > Are there any numbers available on how much they gain? It might be worth
> > to stick in real numbers instead of this alleged 15%.
>
> I get some gain numbers but obviously the workloads makes a huge
> difference. From a scheduler pers
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:14:12 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, Guillaume Knispel wrote:
> > Now everything seems to work fine: my device was not previously not
> > interrupting anymore after typically 1 or 2 minutes (because the
> > interrupt signal stays at level low unt
On Apr 18, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Li Yang wrote:
> On 4/19/2010 10:40 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 15:34 +0800, Li Yang wrote:
>>
>>> From: Zhao Chenhui
>>>
>>> In fsl_of_msi_probe(), the virt_msir's chip_data have been stored
>>> the pointer to struct mpic. We add a struc
Force serialization of userspace-triggered DLPAR/mem operations
Signed-off-by: Thomas Klein
---
Patch created against 2.6.34-rc4
diff -Nurp linux-2.6.34-rc4.orig//drivers/net/ehea/ehea.h
linux-2.6.34-rc4//drivers/net/ehea/ehea.h
--- linux-2.6.34-rc4.orig//drivers/net/ehea/ehea.h 2010-04-
Reset a port's resources only if they're actually in an error state
Signed-off-by: Thomas Klein
---
Patch created against 2.6.34-rc4
diff -Nurp linux-2.6.34-rc4.orig//drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
linux-2.6.34-rc4//drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
--- linux-2.6.34-rc4.orig//drivers/net/ehea/ehea_m
19 matches
Mail list logo
