Albrecht Dreß wrote:
> Make the I2C adapter timeout configurable through a Device Tree property
> which gives the timeout in microseconds.
My understanding is that software properties should not be defined via
the device tree. I think a sysfs entry is more appropriate.
Wolfgang.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:17:55PM +0100, Albrecht Dreà wrote:
> Improve the recovery of the MPC5200B's I2C bus from errors like bus
> hangs.
This is very sparse comapred to the large comment below the --- line,
maybe some more description should be living up here.
Is thios a candidate for an -r
2010/1/22 Marco Stornelli :
> 2010/1/22 Johnny Hung :
>> 2010/1/20 Marco Stornelli :
>>> 2010/1/20 Johnny Hung :
2010/1/19 Matthias Kaehlcke :
> El Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:17:22PM +0100 Ricard Wanderlof ha dit:
>
I consider to use ramdisk as rootfs because worry about wrong
o
Hi Russell,
> This doesn't make any sense. What are you trying to do here?
>
> The get/put operations go together as one logical set - that's why you
> get both if you're using clkdev, and why you're asked to implement both
> __clk_get() and __clk_put() in arch code to do whatever's necessary
>
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 00:48 +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
>
> Some of the benefits of using these generic interfaces include:
> - Interoperability with other users of debug register (such as
> parallel
> kernel requests) i.e. non-exclusive use of debug registers.
> - Enables debugging/tracing tools suc
>From shaggy at linux.vnet.ibm.com Tue Jan 19 08:57:04 2010
From: shaggy at linux.vnet.ibm.com (Dave Kleikamp)
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:57:04 -0700
Subject: [RFC:PATCH 00/03] powerpc: Expose BookE debug registers through
extended ptrace interface
Message-ID: <20100118215704.15684.60646.se
Dear Wolfgang & Arnd,
In message <4b5c5bdf.6020...@grandegger.com> you wrote:
>
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
...
> > Is there any chance of building a kernel that runs on both mpc8xx and
> > mpc5121? AFAIK, the 5121 is built on a 6xx core which is fundamentally
> > incompatible with 8xx due to different
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 21 January 2010, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> The major problem that Anatolij tries to solve are the different
>> register layouts of the supported SOCs, MPC52xx and MPC8xx. They use the
>> same registers but at different offsets. Therefore we cannot handle
>> th
