On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 19:15 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 01 January 2010 06:28:03 pm Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
> >
> > ---
> >
> > no appropriate subsystem maintainer listed in MAINTAINERS.
>
> drivers/char/Makefile:
> obj-$(CONFIG
On Friday 01 January 2010 06:28:03 pm Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
>
> ---
>
> no appropriate subsystem maintainer listed in MAINTAINERS.
drivers/char/Makefile:
obj-$(CONFIG_HVC_CONSOLE) += hvc_vio.o hvsi.o
so it should belong to:
HYPERVISOR VIRTUAL CON
Dear Grant,
In message you
wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, the wrapper script is also being used to do things that
> are completely unrelated to creating wrapper binaries. FIT images
> (and uImages) don't use any of the wrapper bits at all. In fact, as
> seen in this patch, generating them involves
Dear Grant,
In message you
wrote:
>
> Thinking further, I do actually have another concern, at least with
> regard to the way the current patch set implements things. Is it
> expected or even "recommended" that fit images will *always* contain a
> .dtb image? The current patch only handles the
Dear Peter,
In message <1262301038.29396.137.ca...@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
>
> > Why chose a different name at all? We could still call it "uImage",
> > meaning "U-Boot image" - U-Boot is clever enought o detect
> > automatically if we pass it an old style or a fit image.
>
> I agree w
