On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Alan Jenkins
wrote:
> On 10/20/09, Américo Wang wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 02:15:33PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>>BUILD_BUG_ON used to use the optimizer to do code elimination or fail
>>>at link time; it was changed to first the size of a negative array
Here ya go Jonathan,
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/34047/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/34113/
Both patches work for my situation, but I went with the second set as a
final patch(34113).
- Jake Magee
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Jonathan Haws wrote:
> All,
>
> I am using a 405EX CPU
Drop NO_IRQ as 0 is the preferred way to describe 'no irq'
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/221). This change is safe, as the driver is
only used on powerpc, where NO_IRQ is 0 anyhow.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
Cc: Sean MacLennan
Cc: Ben Dooks
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ibm_iic.c | 14 +
Drop NO_IRQ as 0 is the preferred way to describe 'no irq'
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/221). This change is safe, as the driver is
only used on powerpc, where NO_IRQ is 0 anyhow.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
Cc: Jochen Friedrich
Cc: Ben Dooks
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cpm.c |2 +-
1 f
Drop NO_IRQ as 0 is the preferred way to describe 'no irq'
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/221). This change is safe, as the driver is
only used on powerpc, where NO_IRQ is 0 anyhow.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
Cc: Grant Likely
Cc: Ben Dooks
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c |6 +++---
1 f
Hello,
after having to deal with NO_IRQ confusion more than once, I decided to start a
bit of janitorial work and remove it from the i2c-subsystem. Detail for better
using 0 as "no irq" can be found here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/221
Regards,
Wolfram
__
Hi,
I'm working on a MPC8548 processor, using its RapidIO bus. I have two
kernel trees ported for a board, a linux 2.6.24-ppc, and a linux-2.6.31
(powerpc) kernel. I don't think this bus behaviour is RapidIO specific
though, as also the PCI bus and local bus must handle malfunctioning
devices
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:15 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> BUILD_BUG_ON used to use the optimizer to do code elimination or fail
> at link time; it was changed to first the size of a negative array (a
> nicer compile time error), then (in
> 8c87df457cb58fe75b9b893007917cf8095660a0) to a bitfield.
>
All,
I am using a 405EX CPU on a custom board. The layout and hardware is very
similar to the AMCC Kilauea board. Here is the output of uname -a:
Linux (none) 2.6.30.3-wolverine-dirty #3 PREEMPT Thu Sep 10 11:41:37 MDT 2009
ppc unknown
I am getting the following BUG output when my program ex
The Collaborative Memory Manager (CMM) module allocates individual pages
over time that are not migratable. On a long running system this can
severely impact the ability to find enough pages to support a hotplug
memory remove operation.
This patch adds a memory isolation notifier and a memory hot
Hi, David/Michael,
Great great finding! I added halting FEC (the Ethernet controller in
MPC866)
in platforms_fixups() and the problem disappears.
Thank you very much!
Lixin
-Original Message-
From: David Gibson [mailto:da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 6:1
Felix Radensky wrote:
Are you aware of Freescale plans to fix the problem in new silicon
revisions ?
I don't know anything yet -- still trying to get in touch with the
relevant hardware people.
Also, can you please tell what CPUs are affected by this, except 8536
and 8572.
I suppose anyth
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 10:31 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 09:44 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> >> Export the memory_sysdev_class structure. This is needed so we can create
> >> a 'release' file in sysfs in addition to the existing 'probe' file in
> >
Dave Hansen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 09:44 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
Export the memory_sysdev_class structure. This is needed so we can create
a 'release' file in sysfs in addition to the existing 'probe' file in
order to support DLPAR removal of memory on the powerpc/pseries platform.
On Oct 22, 2009, at 9:08 AM, wilbur.chan wrote:
mpc85xx with sata harddisk,which has a rootfs on sda3.
I ' ve tried to use freescale's kernel image , which is togehther
with the mpc85xx board, to successfully mount the sda3 filesystem when
booting,
But when I used my own kernle, it failed:
mpc85xx with sata harddisk,which has a rootfs on sda3.
I ' ve tried to use freescale's kernel image , which is togehther
with the mpc85xx board, to successfully mount the sda3 filesystem when
booting,
But when I used my own kernle, it failed:
I am using kernel 2.6.21.7 to mount the harddis
Hi All,
I am searching for M29W128GH support in Linux kernel 2.6.31.
On internet I am seeing that there is some patch work for fixup on write
buffer coomand on M29W128GH. This shows that Linux kernel 2.6.31 supports
the M29W128GH.
But I am not seeing any memory mapping for M29W128GH.
Can anyone p
Hi List,
I am trying to port a board with PPC440x5 on linux-2.6.31. My board
has 64MB of flash and 256KB of RAM. Since with this much RAM it is not
possible to copy the kernel image to RAM and boot it from there. I was
trying to figure-out option in the kernel which will allow me to
execute it fro
Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Move ehea hcall definitions into hvcall.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard
Acked-by: Thomas Klein
> ---
>
> Index: linux.trees.git/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h
> ===
> --- linux.trees.git.orig/arc
Hi, Scott
Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 07:01:43AM +0200, Felix Radensky wrote:
Thanks for confirmation. So the real problem is eLBC ?
What happens if I access other devices on eLBC (e.g. FPGA)
simultaneously with NAND or NOR ?
AFAICT, the problem is NAND being accessed si
20 matches
Mail list logo
