Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link

2009-07-08 Thread Alan Modra
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:52:59PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > To further verify this if I switch the -me500 to -mspe and build things > seem to be ok. This further points at some APU section related bug. Like omitting .PPC.EMB.apuinfo from your kernel link script? See the ld info doc on orphan

Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link

2009-07-08 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 8, 2009, at 10:39 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Jul 8, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Alan Modra wrote: On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 05:41:39PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: If we modify the linker script: _end2 = .; _end3 = ALIGN(4096); _end4 = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE); . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE); _end

Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link

2009-07-08 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 8, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Alan Modra wrote: On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 05:41:39PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: If we modify the linker script: _end2 = .; _end3 = ALIGN(4096); _end4 = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE); . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE); _end = . ; PROVIDE32 (end = .); and the resu

Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link

2009-07-08 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 8, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Alan Modra wrote: On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 05:41:39PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: If we modify the linker script: _end2 = .; _end3 = ALIGN(4096); _end4 = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE); . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE); _end = . ; PROVIDE32 (end = .); and the resu

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix booke user_disable_single_step()

2009-07-08 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 06:46:18PM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote: >On booke processors, gdb is seeing spurious SIGTRAPs when setting a >watchpoint. > >user_disable_single_step() simply quits when the DAC is non-zero. It should >be clearing the DBCR0_IC and DBCR0_BT bits from the dbcr0 register and >T

[PATCH] powerpc: fix booke user_disable_single_step()

2009-07-08 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On booke processors, gdb is seeing spurious SIGTRAPs when setting a watchpoint. user_disable_single_step() simply quits when the DAC is non-zero. It should be clearing the DBCR0_IC and DBCR0_BT bits from the dbcr0 register and TIF_SINGLESTEP from the thread flag. Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp d

Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link

2009-07-08 Thread Alan Modra
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 05:41:39PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > If we modify the linker script: > > _end2 = .; > _end3 = ALIGN(4096); > _end4 = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE); > . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE); > _end = . ; > PROVIDE32 (end = .); > > and the result is: > > 1000 A _end

Re: switching from initrd to initramfs

2009-07-08 Thread Mikhail Zaturenskiy
> I was hoping to convert this working initrd to initramfs before I try > and create my own initrd, I'm still learning about this process. I got > this to work yesterday morning, but I'm not sure what changed or what > I'm doing differently... > Can somebody help me figure out what's missing? Neve

binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link

2009-07-08 Thread Kumar Gala
Alan, We are seeing an issue w/ld and kernel linking of 32-bit kernels. The ld from fedora 11 (2.19.51.0.2-17.fc11 20090204) ends not providing the proper address for _end. Building stock v2.6.30 w/the mpc85xx_defconfig we get: 1000 A _end Using 2.18.50.20080215 we get: c068 A _en

Re: [PATCH] ehca: use port autodetect mode as default

2009-07-08 Thread Roland Dreier
looks good, applied ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [PATCH] edac: mpc85xx: add support for mpc83xx memory controller

2009-07-08 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 8, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Ira W. Snyder wrote: On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:09:39PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Ira W. Snyder wrote: Add support for the Freescale MPC83xx memory controller to the existing driver for the Freescale MPC85xx memory controller. The only

switching from initrd to initramfs

2009-07-08 Thread Mikhail Zaturenskiy
Hello, I have a working system with an initrd ramdisk and I'm having some trouble switching it over to initramfs. This is for an EP88xc Embedded Planet board, now running U-Boot and using kernel 2.6.29. I prepare my initrd using: genext2fs -U -d rootfs -D rootfs_devices.tab -b 9700 -i 380 initrd.

Re: [PATCH] edac: mpc85xx: add support for mpc83xx memory controller

2009-07-08 Thread Ira W. Snyder
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:09:39PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Ira W. Snyder wrote: > >> Add support for the Freescale MPC83xx memory controller to the >> existing >> driver for the Freescale MPC85xx memory controller. The only >> difference >> between the two proc

Re: [PATCH] edac: mpc85xx: add support for mpc83xx memory controller

2009-07-08 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Ira W. Snyder wrote: Add support for the Freescale MPC83xx memory controller to the existing driver for the Freescale MPC85xx memory controller. The only difference between the two processors are in the CS_BNDS register parsing code. The L2 cache controller doe

Re: [PATCH] edac: mpc85xx: fix warning when building without CONFIG_PCI

2009-07-08 Thread Dave Jiang
Acked-by: Dave Jiang On 07/08/2009 09:15 AM, Ira W. Snyder wrote: When building without CONFIG_PCI the edac_pci_idx variable is unused, causing a build-time warning. Wrap the variable in #ifdef CONFIG_PCI, just like the rest of the PCI support. Signed-off-by: Ira W. Snyder --- drivers/edac/m

[PATCH] edac: mpc85xx: add support for mpc83xx memory controller

2009-07-08 Thread Ira W. Snyder
Add support for the Freescale MPC83xx memory controller to the existing driver for the Freescale MPC85xx memory controller. The only difference between the two processors are in the CS_BNDS register parsing code. The L2 cache controller does not exist on the MPC83xx, but the OF subsystem will not

[PATCH] edac: mpc85xx: fix warning when building without CONFIG_PCI

2009-07-08 Thread Ira W. Snyder
When building without CONFIG_PCI the edac_pci_idx variable is unused, causing a build-time warning. Wrap the variable in #ifdef CONFIG_PCI, just like the rest of the PCI support. Signed-off-by: Ira W. Snyder --- drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions

Re: ALSA fixes for non-coherent ppc32 again

2009-07-08 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:14:54 +0200, Gerhard Pircher wrote: > > > Original-Nachricht > > Datum: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:47:13 +0200 > > Von: Takashi Iwai > > An: "Gerhard Pircher" > > CC: b...@kernel.crashing.org, linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org > > Betreff: Re: ALSA fixes for non-coherent

Re: ALSA fixes for non-coherent ppc32 again

2009-07-08 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:01:50 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 08:34 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 20:18 +0200, Gerhard Pircher wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Takashi Iwai posted patches to make ALSA work on non-coherent PPC32 > > > syst

Re: Chipselect in SPI binding with mpc5200-psc-spi

2009-07-08 Thread Henk Stegeman
It now works, in the dts interrupt-controller = < &gpt6 >; // Use GPT6 as should have been interrupt-parent = < &gpt6 >; // Use GPT6 as On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Henk Stegeman wrote: >> I tried to make use of the irq-controller