On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:57:12PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Brad Boyer writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 12:14:41PM +0530, kernel mailz wrote:
> >> b. using m or Z with a memory address. I tried replacing m/Z but no change
> >> Is there some guideline ?
> >> gcc documentation says Z is
Hi,
Is there somebody else whom i should also address to get an attention
for this patch ? I apolozise if i have not included someone. Kindly
connect to the concerned.
Regards--
Subrata
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 19:22 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Linux next tree(20090626) produced the foll
The workaround enabled by CONFIG_MPIC_BROKEN_REGREAD does not work
on non-broken MPICs. The symptom is no interrupts being received.
The fix is twofold. Firstly the code was broken for multiple isus,
we need to index into the shadow array with the src_no, not the idx.
Secondly, we always do the re
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:44:29 +0200
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 June 2009 01:26:27 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 22:20 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > > > [ 70.584122] hdb:<3>ide-pmac lost interrupt, dma status: 8480
> > >
> > > D
