Re: [PATCH 02/12] fs_enet: Add MPC5121 FEC support.

On Friday 08 May 2009 09:52:51 David Miller wrote: > From: John Rigby > Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 20:02:53 -0600 > > > Also don't forget that the register map is the same on 512x, mx and > > coldfire platforms but not on the other ppc platforms so if you want > > to one binary to rule them all you wil

Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: Keep track of emulated instructions if debugfs is enabled

On Mon, 11 May 2009, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 16:15 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Counters for the various classes of emulated instructions are available > > under > > /sys/kernel/debug/powerpc/emulated_instructions (assumed debugfs is mounted > > on > > /sys/kernel/

Re: device trees.

I will have to look at the code referenced below, But my objective is not to address partial reconfiguration at this time. At Pico we have come to the conclusion that as it is currently done partial reconfiguration has extremely limited use. We are actively looking at other techniq

Re: [PATCH] i2c-cpm: Pass dev ptr to dma_*_coherent rather than NULL

Ben Dooks wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 08:43:14AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: On Apr 22, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Ben Dooks wrote: On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:11:51AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: On Apr 21, 2009, at 7:49 AM, Mark Ware wrote: Recent DMA changes result in a BUG() when NULL is passed to dm

Re: device trees.

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 14:51 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:03 AM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote: >> >    Is there an example somewhere that shows building a device tree on >> > the fly ? >> > >> >    As our products mo

Re: [PATCH] mmc: Add fsl,esdhc as a valid compatible to bind against

On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 08:52 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > We plan to use fsl,esdhc going forward as the base compatible so update > the driver to bind against it. I was going to NAK this based on its non-sensical changelog, but going backward you're not the first to be going forward :) cheers sig

Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: Keep track of emulated instructions if debugfs is enabled

On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 16:15 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Counters for the various classes of emulated instructions are available under > /sys/kernel/debug/powerpc/emulated_instructions (assumed debugfs is mounted on > /sys/kernel/debug). Optionally (controlled by > /sys/kernel/debug/powerpc/

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpic: improve interrupt handling performance

On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 17:08 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > Before when we were setting up the irq host map for mpic we passed in > just isu_size for the size of the linear map. However, for a number of > mpic implementations we have no isu (thus pass in 0) and will end up > with a no linear map (size

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Allow mem=x cmdline to work with 4G+

On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 17:19 -0500, Becky Bruce wrote: > We're currently choking on mem=4g (and above) due to memory_limit > being specified as an unsigned long. Make memory_limit > phys_addr_t to fix this. Can we not just make it u64 to save the casts? cheers signature.asc Description: This is

Re: device trees.

On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 14:51 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:03 AM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote: > >Is there an example somewhere that shows building a device tree on > > the fly ? > > > >As our products move forward it becomes increasingly clear that > > static configur

[PATCH] powerpc: Improve decrementer accuracy

I have been looking at sources of OS jitter and notice that after a long NO_HZ idle period we wakeup too early: relative time (us)event timer irq exit 46.405timer irq entry 4.835timer irq exit 21.685timer irq entry

Re: [PATCH 08/15] powerpc/cell: Extract duplicated IOPTE_* to

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 04:01:17PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > +/* Cell page table entries */ > +#define IOPTE_PP_W 0x8000ul /* protection: write */ > +#define IOPTE_PP_R 0x4000ul /* protection: read */ > +#define IOPTE_M 0x200