Re: MPC5121e, MBX driver, pvr.ko ...

2009-02-15 Thread David Jander
On Friday 06 February 2009 10:03:55 Klaus Pedersen wrote: > Hi David > > I'm also run on a custom board, and using the MBX. > > You need to get the device tree file right. You will see the MBX reserved > the irq 66 in the boot printout. > Instead of using insmod use modprobe. The are 2 versions of

Re: OpenPIC / CPM2 PIC and cascading interrupt priorities

2009-02-15 Thread Guillaume Knispel
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:04:20 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > static void cpm2_cascade(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) > > { > > int cascade_irq; > > > > while ((cascade_irq = cpm2_get_irq()) >= 0) > > generic_handle_irq(cascade_irq); > > > > desc->chip->

Re: OpenPIC / CPM2 PIC and cascading interrupt priorities

2009-02-15 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> static void cpm2_cascade(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) > { > int cascade_irq; > > while ((cascade_irq = cpm2_get_irq()) >= 0) > generic_handle_irq(cascade_irq); > > desc->chip->eoi(irq); > } You can try doing an early EOI see that helps. Ie, stick it

Re: 4xx tree updates

2009-02-15 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:31:40AM -0800, Felix Radensky wrote: >What about 4xx SPI driver ? Is it planned for inclusion in 2.6.30 ? I really hope so. I've Acked it twice now I think. However, that needs to go in through the SPI tree, which isn't mine. josh

The state of Serial Rapid IO on MPC8548

2009-02-15 Thread Felix Radensky
Hi I've noticed that in 2.6.29-rc5 Serial Rapid IO is only available for 86xx processors. There's also no Freescale BSP for 8548. What is the best source of SRIO driver for this CPU ? Can I simply enable SRIO support in mainline kernel for 85xx and hope it will work ? Thanks. Felix. -- View t

Re: 4xx tree updates

2009-02-15 Thread Felix Radensky
Josh Boyer-4 wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've been rather busy lately and have unfortunately gotten behind on > updating the 4xx tree. I spent some time this weekend looking over > the patches queued up, and fortunately there were not too many. I'm > doing some build testing of these 4 today: >

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: Include arch Makefiles as late as possible

2009-02-15 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 23:03 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > So the question is: even with FRAME_POINTERS disabled on PPC, is > > __builtin_return_address(1)/(2) reliable, and is save_stack_trace() fast? > > (i.e. > > can it walk down the stack frame efficie