Re: [GIT PULL] LED updates for 2.6.29

2009-01-10 Thread Trent Piepho
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 04:31 -0800, Trent Piepho wrote: > > The LED tree makes more sense for what's left I think. There was a > > openfirmware gpio patch, but that's already gone in. What's left only > > touches led files and the device tree binding do

Re: [GIT PULL] LED updates for 2.6.29

2009-01-10 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Richard Purdie wrote: > Ok, these are now queued in the LED tree: > > http://git.o-hand.com/cgit.cgi/linux-rpurdie-leds/log/ > > I did merge the last three patches in one and make some changes to deal > with some other outstanding issues. Let me know ASAP if there are any >

Re: [GIT PULL] LED updates for 2.6.29

2009-01-10 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 04:31 -0800, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 12:37 -0800, Trent Piepho wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > for the LED tree updates for 2.6.29. This includes some new drivers, > > > > bugfixes

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: rework dma-noncoherent to use generic vmap/vunmap functions

2009-01-10 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Ilya Yanok wrote: > This patch rewrites consistent dma allocations support to use vmalloc > layer to allocate virtual memory space from vmalloc pool and get rid > of CONFIG_CONSISTENT_{START,SIZE}. Impressive patch. I'll pull it into my tree and see how it works o

Re: [BUG] 2.6.28-git-4 - powerpc - kernel expection 'c01 at .kernel_thread'

2009-01-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday 02 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > Hi, > > 2.6.28-git4 kernel drops to xmon with kernel expection. Similar kernel > expection was seen next-20081230 and next-20081231 and was reported > earlier at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/31/157 Is this a regression from 2.6.27? Rafa

Re: [PATCH RFC v5] net: add PCINet driver

2009-01-10 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 13:51 -0800, Ira Snyder wrote: > The guests (PowerPC computers running Linux) are PCI cards in the host > system (an Intel Pentium3-M system). The guest computers can access all > of the host's memory. The guests provide a 1MB (movable) window into > their memory. > > The Pow

Re: [Patch 0/3] Overview, OProfile SPU event profiling support for IBM Cell processor

2009-01-10 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 16:26 -0800, Carl Love wrote: > I pulled down the git tree, compiled and installed it. I tested it > against the OProfile testsuite, which includes SPU event profiling > tests. Everything passed. The patch I submitted was against a 2.6.26 > tree. You are now on a 2.6.28 tr

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: rework dma-noncoherent to use generic vmap/vunmap functions

2009-01-10 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 15:58 +0300, Ilya Yanok wrote: > This patch rewrites consistent dma allocations support to use vmalloc > layer to allocate virtual memory space from vmalloc pool and get rid > of CONFIG_CONSISTENT_{START,SIZE}. Ah good, I like that. I haven't reviewed in details yet but that'

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Add support to access the flash on SLOF based systems

2009-01-10 Thread Adrian Reber
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:52:56AM -0600, Milton Miller wrote: > On Sun Jan 11 at 02:31:22 EST in 2009, Adrian Reber wrote: >> This adds support for a simple character device to access the >> flash for SLOF based systems like the PowerStation, QS2x and >> PXCAB. In the SLOF git there is a user spac

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Add support to access the flash on SLOF based systems

2009-01-10 Thread Milton Miller
On Sun Jan 11 at 02:31:22 EST in 2009, Adrian Reber wrote: This adds support for a simple character device to access the flash for SLOF based systems like the PowerStation, QS2x and PXCAB. In the SLOF git there is a user space program with which the content of the flash for SLOF based systems ca

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpc52xx: Properly update irq_desc when set_type() is called.

2009-01-10 Thread Matt Sealey
Grant Likely wrote: Not entirely; it affects the details about how irqs are handled. check_irq_resend() for example. I don't think any 5200 platforms currently care; but it could be an issue with cascaded IRQ handlers. I'm not sure if that would be a problem or not. Would it shed some light

[PATCH] powerpc: Add support to access the flash on SLOF based systems

2009-01-10 Thread Adrian Reber
This adds support for a simple character device to access the flash for SLOF based systems like the PowerStation, QS2x and PXCAB. In the SLOF git there is a user space program with which the content of the flash for SLOF based systems can be displayed and modified. This can be used to add a Linux i

Re: [GIT PULL] LED updates for 2.6.29

2009-01-10 Thread Trent Piepho
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 12:37 -0800, Trent Piepho wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > for the LED tree updates for 2.6.29. This includes some new drivers, > > > bugfixes and a core improvement resulting in nicer code. > > > > > > > An