Hi. I posted this before, but I don't see it in any of your powerpc.git
trees. Can you push this upstream ASAP? It would make life easier for me
trying to merge some more generic changes (that would break powerpc builds
without this going in first).
Thanks,
Roland
---
[PATCH] powerpc copy_sigi
> This is intended as a reminder that we plan on getting rid of arch/ppc
> this summer. I'm guessing based on kernel release times that will be
> 2.6.27. That would mean 2.6.26 will be the last kernel to support
> arch/ppc.
>
> If people have boards that like ported over please let us know and
>
I wholeheartedly agree, although the difference between gpt and timer
and pic vs interrupt-controller (actually interrupt-controller is meant
to be a property of the interrupt controller, not a device type.. weird)
was chosen because they did not conflict with what might be considered
"standard de
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have a board port in arch/powerpc so we dont need this one anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Personally, I'd rather not do the piecemeal removal of board ports
from arch/ppc. We've only got one re
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 10:30 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> This is intended as a reminder that we plan on getting rid of arch/ppc
> this summer. I'm guessing based on kernel release times that will be
> 2.6.27. That would mean 2.6.26 will be the last kernel to support
> arch/ppc.
>
> If people
Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:09:55 +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
>> Hi Jean,
>>
> Is the new-style driver conversion patch in 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 scheduled for
> 2.6.26 ?
hope so! :)
>>> Note that this patch depends on i2c patches which aren't upstream yet.
>> Is there any
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is intended as a reminder that we plan on getting rid of arch/ppc this
> summer. I'm guessing based on kernel release times that will be 2.6.27.
> That would mean 2.6.26 will be the last kernel to support arch/ppc.
>
>
Current versions of gdb require a working implementation of
PTRACE_GETSIGINFO for proper watchpoint support. Since struct siginfo
contains pointers it must be converted when passed to a 32-bit debugger.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc32.h|2 +
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Segher Boessenkool
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The mpc5200b is a bug fix of the mpc5200 with a few incompatible changes.
> > By rights, the current dts trees are the most "correct", but in practical
> > purposes there is no value in the 5200b devices having 2 c
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Peter Czanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> factory:/usr/src/linux-2.6.25 # diff -u
> arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c.orig arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c
> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c.orig2008-04-18
> 13:55:07.0 +0200
> +++ arch/
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 6:02 AM, Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Grant Likely wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Juergen Beisert wrote:
> > >
> >
> > BTW, is anyone trying to shepherd this driver into the ALSA tree? Its
We have a board port in arch/powerpc so we dont need this one anymore.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Will push via git tree. Removed defconfig diff to shorten patch.
arch/ppc/8xx_io/enet.c| 23 --
arch/ppc/Kconfig | 63
arch/ppc
We have a board port in arch/powerpc so we dont need this one anymore.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Will push via git tree. Removed defconfig diff to shorten patch.
arch/ppc/8260_io/fcc_enet.c | 19 +-
arch/ppc/Kconfig | 19 +-
arch/ppc/c
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Robert Schwebel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:10:04AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Update dts files to current format
>
> Is it somehow possible that this device tree stuff is *not* changed over
> and over again and break everything ou
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 10:26 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Commit d04ceb3fc294ea2c4f538a04343f3a473953a3b0 moved phys_addr_t definitions
> to include/asm-powerpc/types.h. However, arch/ppc 440 builds had a duplicate
> definition in include/asm-ppc/mmu.h that caused the build to fail.
>
> This removes
This is intended as a reminder that we plan on getting rid of arch/ppc
this summer. I'm guessing based on kernel release times that will be
2.6.27. That would mean 2.6.26 will be the last kernel to support
arch/ppc.
If people have boards that like ported over please let us know and
work
Commit d04ceb3fc294ea2c4f538a04343f3a473953a3b0 moved phys_addr_t definitions
to include/asm-powerpc/types.h. However, arch/ppc 440 builds had a duplicate
definition in include/asm-ppc/mmu.h that caused the build to fail.
This removes the duplicate definition in arch/ppc.
Signed-off-by: Josh Boy
On Apr 18, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
- whitespace cleanups
- remove pointless prototype (uses always follow func implementation)
- 'irq' argument is often used purely as a local variable. rename
argument to 'dummy' and define 'irq' as local to make this plain.
- remove pointless
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:55:03 -0700
Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Previously, dcr support was configured at compile time to either using
> MMIO or native dcr instructions. Although this works for most
> platforms, it fails on FPGA platforms:
>
> 1) Systems may include more tha
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:10:04AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> Update dts files to current format
Is it somehow possible that this device tree stuff is *not* changed over
and over again and break everything out there? When people have not even
agreed on basic things like decimal vs. hex numbers,
Kumar Gala writes:
> [POWERPC] 85xx: Add support for relocatble kernel (and booting at non-
> zero)
Should be OK to go though probably not in the first batch. I want to
look through it carefully again since it's touching code that is
common to a lot of platforms. The patch description looks re
Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Juergen Beisert wrote:
BTW, is anyone trying to shepherd this driver into the ALSA tree? Its
out of my area of expertise and responsibility, so I haven't been
pursuing it.
We (well, I) were going t
Jean Delvare writes:
> Guys, you're doing things the wrong way around. Breaking things to fix
> them later is not OK, it's a pain for testers and also when bisecting
> the kernel. Everything should still work after merging the powerpc
> tree. Dave, if you need to loosen the dependency, you should
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:57:05 -0500 (CDT)
> Von: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Betreff: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Port fixmap from x86 and use for kmap_atomic
> The fixmap code from x86 all
The AMCC 460GT doesn't have an FPU so let's not enable support for it.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_44x.S |1 -
arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c |4 +---
2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/ker
This patch adds default NOR entries to the AMCC Canyonlands (460EX)
and Glacier (460GT) dts files.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/canyonlands.dts | 37 +
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/glacier.dts | 37 +
The mpc5200b is a bug fix of the mpc5200 with a few incompatible
changes.
By rights, the current dts trees are the most "correct", but in
practical
purposes there is no value in the 5200b devices having 2 compatible
entries for each internal peripheral node. Freescale has done a good
job
of d
From: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 11:09:34 +0200
> Guys, you're doing things the wrong way around. Breaking things to fix
> them later is not OK, it's a pain for testers and also when bisecting
> the kernel. Everything should still work after merging the powerpc
> tree.
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:11:28 -0700 (PDT), David Miller wrote:
> From: Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:22:37 +1000
>
> > David Miller writes:
> > > From: Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:04:32 +1000
> > >
> > > It's OK if this breaks
29 matches
Mail list logo
