On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:42:26AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:33:16 +0100
> Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:25:52AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:08:01 +0100
> > > Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:25:52AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:08:01 +0100
> Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The patch below was not yet tested. If it's correct as it is, please
> > comment. ---
> > Fix Unlikely(x) == y
> >
>
> you found a great set of bug
Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:11:12 -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote:
>
>> Here is the of platform patch. I removed the retries and removed the spaces
>> used for spacing.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>Sean
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>
> First o
On 02/16/2008 08:08 AM, Roel Kluin wrote:
> The patch below was not yet tested. If it's correct as it is, please comment.
> - if (unlikely(plug) == NO_IRQ) {
> + if (unlikely(plug == NO_IRQ)) {
A good catch! I'll put it in with some other 2.6.25 bug fixes.
-Geoff
__
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:31:26 -0800
Geoff Levand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/16/2008 09:42 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:33:16 +0100
> > Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:25:52AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >> > On Sat
On 02/16/2008 09:42 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:33:16 +0100
> Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:25:52AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:08:01 +0100
>> > Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > The
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:58:49 +0100
> > If you think unlikely() means something else, we should fix what it
> > maps to towards gcc ;) (to.. be empty ;)
>
> eventhough the gcc docs say it's just a hint to help the compiler
> optimize the branch it takes by default, I too have noticed that it
> more
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:33:16 +0100
Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:25:52AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:08:01 +0100
> > Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > The patch below was not yet tested. If it's correct as it is,
Hi Andrew,
The 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel build fails on the powerpc(s)
CC security/keys/compat.o
security/keys/compat.c: In function ‘compat_sys_keyctl’:
security/keys/compat.c:83: error: implicit declaration of function
‘keyctl_get_security’
make[2]: *** [security/keys/compat.o] Error 1
mak
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:08:01 +0100
Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patch below was not yet tested. If it's correct as it is, please
> comment. ---
> Fix Unlikely(x) == y
>
you found a great set of bugs..
but to be honest... I suspect it's just best to remove unlikely altogether for
The patch below was not yet tested. If it's correct as it is, please comment.
---
Fix Unlikely(x) == y
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/interrupt.c
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/interrupt.c
index 3a6db04..a14e5cd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/pl
On Friday 15 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> The linux-next-20080215 kernel build fails on the powerpc with
> following error
>
> CC arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/setup.o
> In file included from arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/setup.c:66:
> include/asm/mediabay.h:29: error: synt
Hi Paul,
Please pull from:
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jwboyer/powerpc-4xx.git for-2.6.25
to pick up a few fixes and some defconfig cleanups for .25. The netdev
patch was Acked by Ben and Jeff asked we take it through the powerpc
tree.
The diffstat is bloated from the defconfi
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 18:44 +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> This patch adds support for the framebuffers with non-native
> endianness. This is done via FBINFO_FOREIGN_ENDIAN flag that will
> be used by the drivers. Depending on the host endianness this flag
> will be overwritten by FBINFO_BE_MATH
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:17 -0600, Becky Bruce wrote:
> dt_mem_next_cell() currently does of_read_ulong(). This does
> not allow for the case where #size-cells and/or #address-cells = 2 on
> a 32-bit system, as it will end up reading 32 bits instead of the
> expected 64. Change it to use of_read_
Hi Sean,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:11:12 -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote:
> Here is the of platform patch. I removed the retries and removed the spaces
> used for spacing.
>
> Cheers,
>Sean
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
First of all: please run scripts/checkpatch.pl on you
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:07:21 -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Please split your patch into logical parts:
> > * Whitespace and coding-style cleanups
> > * Other cleanups (e.g. changing the log levels)
> > * Add OF support
> >
> Here is the first patch with everything except
17 matches
Mail list logo