Just in time for the holidays, I created my for-2.6.25 branch. It
contains the commits below. I'll let it sit for a couple days given
the timing of things, and ask Paul to pull a bit later.
If I've missed something, let me know.
josh
Benjamin Herrenschmidt (19):
[POWERPC] Reworking machi
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 12:01:35PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> >> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> >> + compatible = "betaresearch,dbox2-localbus";
> >
> > Is this bus interface really board specific? I would have thought the
> > localbus bridge would have been part of the So
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 11:24:19AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> > Sounds like a board rework document on your support site is the right
> > place for this.
>
> Except that no one would know to look there.
Why do you expect people to look at the device tree source file in
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 08:49:12PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Hi Greg, do you even build with your patches applied?
>
> For the power architecture, no, I do not. I used to, but my cross-build
> box died and I haven't taken the time to set it all up again.
Crosstool makes it really easy. It's demo
On Sunday 23 December 2007, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> This patch adds device tree source, default config and setup code for
> DBox2 devices.
Cool stuff. I used to have one of these boxes myself, maybe I should
get one again when it's hitting mainline.
Is this already a complete port, or do you al
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> You need "bus-frequency" here too
>
> Hm..
>
> http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-December/048388.html
>
> ^^ David Gibson suggested to get rid of it.
It looks to me like he's just suggesting that we rename it to
clock-frequency. That may be a better nam
Olof Johansson wrote:
> Sounds like a board rework document on your support site is the right
> place for this.
Except that no one would know to look there. I don't even know who to
contact to get that kind of information on that site.
> We normally don't document board reworks required in
>
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/mpc8xx.h b/include/asm-powerpc/
> mpc8xx.h
> index 2be014b..b6fd7d6 100644
> --- a/include/asm-powerpc/mpc8xx.h
> +++ b/include/asm-powerpc/mpc8xx.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,10 @@
> #include
> #endif
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_DBOX2)
> +#include
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CON
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 19:32:10 -0600
Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:39:21 +1100
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Index: linux-merge/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> > ===
> > --- li
Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Valentine,
>
> On Friday 21 December 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote:
>>> Good catch. I'll have to look more closely to see if anything else
>>> would be broken by changing the cpu node name from "PowerPC,[EMAIL
>>> PROTECTED]" to
>>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
>>>
>>> josh
>> L
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 09:28:31PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> >+[EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> >+#address-cells = <1>;
> >+#size-cells = <1>;
> >+compatible = "fsl,qe";
> >+ranges = <0 0xe010 0x0010>;
> >+reg
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 09:25:56PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> >2. QE SCCs (slow UCCs, used as an UARTs)
>
> I a posted a driver that provides this support, I'm just waiting for
> Kumar to apply it.
Yup. I've seen it, thanks. I'm going to test it as well. ;-)
> What r
Hi David,
>> +[EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>> +compatible = "betaresearch,dbox2-localbus";
>
> Is this bus interface really board specific? I would have thought the
> localbus bridge would have been part of the SoC in which case the
> compatible string should mention the 823 rather than t
13 matches
Mail list logo
