Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: fix compilation

2007-09-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
Anton Vorontsov wrote: > Currently qe_bd_t is used in the macro call -- dma_unmap_single, > which is a no-op on PPC32, thus error is hidden today. Starting > with 2.6.24, macro will be replaced by the empty static function, > and erroneous use of qe_bd_t will trigger compilation error. > > Signed-

Re: [patch 3/4] 4xx: Convert Walnut flash mappings to new binding

2007-09-15 Thread Segher Boessenkool
>> Maybe we can have U-Boot add the partition information if it's >> missing in the device tree, and extend the mtdparts command in U-Boot >> to add / adjust settings so they match what is defined in U-Boot. > > That would be great for newer U-Boots. For existing older ones, it > doesn't re

Re: [patch 3/4] 4xx: Convert Walnut flash mappings to new binding

2007-09-15 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 17:09 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 05:23 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > ... > > > There are not only Bamboo board running PIBS, but running U-Boot too. How > > > should we handle this different FLASH pa

Re: [patch 3/4] 4xx: Convert Walnut flash mappings to new binding

2007-09-15 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Josh Boyer wrote: > On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 05:23 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: ... > > There are not only Bamboo board running PIBS, but running U-Boot too. How > > should we handle this different FLASH partitioning? Same goes for Ebony too > > btw. > > That's a good q

Re: PPC4xx maintainer?

2007-09-15 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 14:31 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Stefan Roese writes: > > > I really think that now, as the PPC4xx Linux development is picking up in > > speed in the ongoing move to arch/powerpc, we need an "active" maintainer > > for > > the 4xx Linux kernel platform. Since I haven'

Re: [patch 1/4] cuimage for Bamboo board

2007-09-15 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 12:19 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:54:11PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > Add a cuboot wrapper for the Bamboo board. This also removes some obsoleted > > linker declarations that have been moved into ops.h > > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PR

Re: [patch 3/4] 4xx: Convert Walnut flash mappings to new binding

2007-09-15 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 05:23 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > On Friday 14 September 2007, Josh Boyer wrote: > > A new binding for flash devices was recently introduced. This updates the > > Walnut DTS to use the new binding. > > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > arch/power

Re: [patch 3/4] 4xx: Convert Walnut flash mappings to new binding

2007-09-15 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 12:22 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:54:13PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > A new binding for flash devices was recently introduced. This updates the > > Walnut DTS to use the new binding. > > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Acked-b

Re: [PATCH] add Kconfig option for optimizing for cell

2007-09-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday 15 September 2007, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 02:21 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Since the PPE on cell is an in-order core, it suffers significantly > > from wrong instruction scheduling. This adds an Kconfig option that > > enables passing -mtune=cell to gcc in o

Re: [PATCH] add Kconfig option for optimizing for cell

2007-09-15 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 02:21 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Since the PPE on cell is an in-order core, it suffers significantly > from wrong instruction scheduling. This adds an Kconfig option that > enables passing -mtune=cell to gcc in order to generate object > code that runs well on cell. Do we

Re: [PATCH] i2c: devtree-aware iic support for PPC4xx

2007-09-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
[Just some trivial things] On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:08:01 +0200 Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ibm_iic.h > @@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ > #ifndef __I2C_IBM_IIC_H_ > #define __I2C_IBM_IIC_H_ > > -#include > +#include > +#include Please include linux/of.h, of_de

Re: [PATCH] i2c: devtree-aware iic support for PPC4xx

2007-09-15 Thread Vitaly Bordug
Hello Eugene, On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 03:04:34 -0700 Eugene Surovegin wrote: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:08:01AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > > This patch reworks existing ibm-iic driver to an of_platform_device > > and enables it to talk to device tree directly. The ocp quirks are > > completely re

Re: [PATCH] i2c: devtree-aware iic support for PPC4xx

2007-09-15 Thread Eugene Surovegin
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:08:01AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > This patch reworks existing ibm-iic driver to an of_platform_device > and enables it to talk to device tree directly. The ocp quirks are > completely removed by this patch. > > This is done to enable I2C support for the PPC4xx platfor

[PATCH] i2c: devtree-aware iic support for PPC4xx

2007-09-15 Thread Stefan Roese
This patch reworks existing ibm-iic driver to an of_platform_device and enables it to talk to device tree directly. The ocp quirks are completely removed by this patch. This is done to enable I2C support for the PPC4xx platforms now being moved from arch/ppc (ocp) to arch/powerpc (of). The first b