On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This happened with 2.6.12-rc5-mm1.
> One side effect was that eth0 locked up..?
>
>
> scheduling while atomic: khubd/0x0001/4258
> [] schedule+0x5cc/0x5e0
> [] invalidate_inode_buffers+0xc/0x70
> [] __wake_up+0x14/0x20
> [] __down+0x7b/0
Hi,
This happened with 2.6.12-rc5-mm1.
One side effect was that eth0 locked up..?
scheduling while atomic: khubd/0x0001/4258
[] schedule+0x5cc/0x5e0
[] invalidate_inode_buffers+0xc/0x70
[] __wake_up+0x14/0x20
[] __down+0x7b/0xf0
[] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
[] simple_unlink+0x3b/0x50
[]
