Greg --
Greg KH wrote:
> I agree. Care to do the port? :)
Sure. I won't be able to start on until after
Feb 5, though.
-- Al
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 03:57:57PM -0600, Al Borchers wrote:
> Greg --
>
> Greg KH wrote:
> > I agree. We can either use Pete's patch, or work on backporting the 2.6
> > code to 2.4 (no semaphores, and any locking that is needed must be
> > handled by the individual drivers.)
>
> Thanks for the
Greg --
Greg KH wrote:
> I agree. We can either use Pete's patch, or work on backporting the 2.6
> code to 2.4 (no semaphores, and any locking that is needed must be
> handled by the individual drivers.)
Thanks for the pointer to Pete's patch--I did a quick search
before posting but did not find
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 06:16:05AM -0600, Al Borchers wrote:
>
> We simply can't be using semaphores in interrupt code
> like serial_write. We need to look at how usbserial.c
> can better handle synchronization.
I agree. We can either use Pete's patch, or work on backporting the 2.6
code to 2.4
