Documentation On Gadget Drivers (g_ffs)

2018-05-23 Thread R0b0t1
not know how to troubleshoot. I am trying to work on getting libusbg or libusbgx on my device. Is that the recommended method? When using gadget drivers, how is the device-capable port specified if there is more than one? Cheers, R0b0t1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Can Only Enable 2 Classes Using Gadget ConfigFS

2018-06-10 Thread R0b0t1
oting information. Thanks in advance, R0b0t1 --- #!/bin/bash set -euo pipefail # General configuration: GADGET_NAME="testgadget" LANGUAGE=0x409 MANUFACTURER="Sidney Spry" PRODUCT="Test Gadget" # Function configuration: HOST_ADDRESS="1a:55:89:a2:69:42"

UHID Device Reports Do Not Generate OS Activity

2018-02-10 Thread R0b0t1
OSE. Many different report descriptors were tried. The one currently uncommented is the one distributed with the USB implementor forum's HID report descriptor tool. The other is one found in a description of a boot device compatible keyboard. Thanks in advance, R0b0t1 #define _GNU_SOURCE #in

Re: UHID Device Reports Do Not Generate OS Activity

2018-02-11 Thread R0b0t1
to see if it would be necessary to maintain that control. It might be best to switch to uinput, but once you have USB descriptors USB is actually very simple. Cheers, R0b0t1 > Thanks, > Roderick > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 1:33 AM, R0b0t1 wrote: >> Hello, >> >

Zero Packets in Isochronous Transfer Reception

2018-06-30 Thread R0b0t1
dible results I get it seems that runs of zeros still seem to slip in. The problem seems more noticeable when using the Python libusb bindings but it still exists when using libusb directly. Can anyone suggest what to look into? Thanks in advance, R0b0t1 --- #!/usr/bin/env python3 import usb,

Re: Zero Packets in Isochronous Transfer Reception

2018-07-04 Thread R0b0t1
On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sat, 30 Jun 2018, R0b0t1 wrote: > >> The problem seems more noticeable when using the Python libusb >> bindings but it still exists when using libusb directly. Can anyone >> suggest what to look into? > >

Re: Zero Packets in Isochronous Transfer Reception

2018-07-09 Thread R0b0t1
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, R0b0t1 wrote: >> >> This message was resent. The list has been eating my messages. It >> seems like no attachments besides text/plain are accepted, which is >> unfortunate because it means I can

Re: Zero Packets in Isochronous Transfer Reception

2018-07-14 Thread R0b0t1
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, R0b0t1 wrote: > >> >> Is anyone able to comment on this in more detail? I thought it was >> supposed to be reported if a transfer did not arrive in time. > > It depends on what you mean by "