On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:04:24PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for the reply.
> >
> > Some updates:
> >
> > After running usbmon, I realized that the paging request address is the
> > address of the urb.
>
> That doesn't make sense. implement() shouldn't know anything about the
>
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 08:16:12PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Aug 2012, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > > Looking at the output of usbmon, the kernel re-uses URB addresses. Is it
> > > possible that the urb is freed while the instruction is in
> > > *implement()*?
> >
> > In fact, the usbhid d
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 07:55:13AM -0800, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:43:11PM -0800, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> >> I was looking at the changes for net2280.c and saw your name come up in
> >&g
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:11:30PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have seen on the list that there was a previous interest on giving
> support for this chipset. Is anyone currently working on it?
>
> Apparently the chip can be configured in "legacy mode" being register
> comp
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:48:02PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
[snip]
> if original driver is GPL, how about sending it for inclusion in
> mainline ? If anybody wants to sponsor one USB3380 for my testing, I'd
> be very thankful too as that'll help me make sure things get tested
> before going ups
