On 12.06.2018 19:33, Mats Karrman wrote:
> Hi Andrzej,
>
> On 2018-06-07 13:40, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>
>> On 06.06.2018 23:36, Mats Karrman wrote:
>>> Hello Gentlemen,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to get my head around USB role switches in connection with
>>> Type-C ports
>>> and device-trees. So far I have
Hi Johan,
On 31/05/18 17:45, Johan Hovold wrote:
> The clocks have already been explicitly disabled and put as part of
> remove() so the runtime suspend callback must not be run when balancing
> the runtime PM usage count before returning.
>
> Fixes: 16adc674d0d6 ("usb: dwc3: add generic OF glue
Roger Quadros writes:
> Hi Johan,
>
> On 31/05/18 17:45, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> The clocks have already been explicitly disabled and put as part of
>> remove() so the runtime suspend callback must not be run when balancing
>> the runtime PM usage count before returning.
>>
>> Fixes: 16adc674d0d6
On 13/06/18 11:05, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Roger Quadros writes:
>
>> Hi Johan,
>>
>> On 31/05/18 17:45, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> The clocks have already been explicitly disabled and put as part of
>>> remove() so the runtime suspend callback must not be run when balancing
>>> the runtime PM usage c
On Di, 2018-06-12 at 21:57 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Yes, the atomic case should be rare. It will only happen on errors, and
> > IIUC that's only to work around issues caused by reporting errors back
> > to userspace without actually wanting to err out anyway.
>
> Yup. The missi
Roger Quadros writes:
> On 13/06/18 11:05, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> Roger Quadros writes:
>>
>>> Hi Johan,
>>>
>>> On 31/05/18 17:45, Johan Hovold wrote:
The clocks have already been explicitly disabled and put as part of
remove() so the runtime suspend callback must not be run when bal
Hi Heikki,
> -Original Message-
> From: Heikki Krogerus [mailto:heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: 2018年6月11日 19:09
> To: Jun Li
> Cc: robh...@kernel.org; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; li...@roeck-us.net;
> cw00.c...@samsung.com; a.ha...@samsung.com; shufan_...@richtek.com;
> Peter Che
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 12:39:18PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Roger Quadros writes:
> > I'm still trying to get my head around this.
> >
> > in probe() we do
> > {
> > enable all clocks;
> > pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> > pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> > pm_runtime_get_s
This bug happens only when the UDC needs to sleep during usb_ep_dequeue,
as is the case for (at least) dwc3.
[ 382.200896] BUG: scheduling while atomic: screen/1808/0x0100
[ 382.207124] 4 locks held by screen/1808:
[ 382.211266] #0: (rcu_callback){}, at: []
rcu_process_callbacks+0x26
Hello,
On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 01:02:24 +0300, Sam Protsenko
wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> The issue you mentioned in your RFC patch is also reproducing on TI
> X15 board (dwc3) with Android master, when doing "adb root" command.
> Your patch fixes it just fine, for which I really thankful.
Thanks a lot
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:groe...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
> Sent: 2018年6月11日 21:35
> To: Heikki Krogerus ; Jun Li
> Cc: robh...@kernel.org; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; cw00.c...@samsung.com;
> a.ha...@samsung.com; shufan_...@richtek.com; Peter Che
Hi
> -Original Message-
> From: Jun Li
> Sent: 2018年6月13日 19:07
> To: Guenter Roeck ; Heikki Krogerus
> ; shufan_...@richtek.com
> Cc: robh...@kernel.org; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; cw00.c...@samsung.com;
> a.ha...@samsung.com; Peter Chen ;
> garsi...@embeddedor.com; gso...@gmail.com; linu
The SanDisk SDDR-31 needs the US_FL_FIX_CAPACITY quirk. Previously that
was only applied for bcdDevice 0x0009, but later firmware which reports
bcdDevice 0x0022 needs it too.
Signed-off-by: Mark Knibbs
---
v4: Max. bcdDevice is 0x0022 again, removed extraneous text
v3: Fixed tabs, but accidentall
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 07:16:03PM +0200, Mats Karrman wrote:
> On 2018-06-07 14:01, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 09:22:56AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 06-06-18 23:36, Mats Karrman wrote:
> > > > Hello Gentlemen,
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to get
In the code path
__usb_hcd_giveback_urb()
-> wdm_in_callback()
-> service_outstanding_interrupt()
The function service_outstanding_interrupt() will unconditionally enable
interrupts during unlock and invoke usb_submit_urb() with GFP_KERNEL.
If the HCD completes in BH (like ehci does) then t
On Mi, 2018-06-13 at 18:28 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The function service_outstanding_interrupt() will unconditionally enable
> interrupts during unlock and invoke usb_submit_urb() with GFP_KERNEL.
> If the HCD completes in BH (like ehci does) then the context remains
> atomic due l
On 2018-06-13 19:43:55 [+0200], Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Mi, 2018-06-13 at 18:28 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > The function service_outstanding_interrupt() will unconditionally enable
> > interrupts during unlock and invoke usb_submit_urb() with GFP_KERNEL.
> > If the HCD completes i
Hi Minas:
>-Original Message-
>From: linux-usb-ow...@vger.kernel.org
>[mailto:linux-usb-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Minas Harutyunyan
>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 4:37 PM
>To: Felipe Balbi ; Greg Kroah-Hartman
>; Minas Harutyunyan
>; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
>Cc: John Youn
>Subj
18 matches
Mail list logo
