Hi,
I have a device (thermal printer) which communicates through rs232. It
has also usb adapter/converter build-in.
root@emanuel-laptop:/home/emanuel# lsusb
Bus 004 Device 004: ID 8086:0189 Intel Corp.
Bus 004 Device 008: ID 1a28:6010 <-- here
Bus 004 Device 002: ID 8087:0024 Intel Corp. Integ
hi alan:
2014-02-14 23:36 GMT+08:00 Alan Stern :
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, vichy wrote:
>
>> hi Alan:
>>
>> > I don't understand your question.
>> >
>> > At full speed (12 Mb/s), the time required to transfer 188 bytes is
>> >
>> > (188 bytes) * (8 bits/byte) / (12 b/us) = 125.33 us,
>> >
>>
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, vichy wrote:
> it makes me a little confused.
> if we try to send 108 bytes to FS iso ep over HS hub.
> shouldn't we use below formula to calculate what bus time need for?
> NS_TO_US (think_time + usb_calc_bus_time (
> dev->speed, is_input, 1, 108));
That
USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI, USB_ARCH_HAS_OHCI, and USB_ARCH_HAS_XHCI were made
obsolete in v3.11. They have not been used ever since. Setting them has
no effect. They can safely be removed.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
---
Tested with "git grep".
Note that the comment in this Kconfig file (that is also remo
USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI, USB_ARCH_HAS_OHCI, and USB_ARCH_HAS_XHCI were just
removed. Selecting them is a nop. The select statements for these
symbols can be removed too.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
---
Tested with "git grep".
Sending this as a few separate patches to the maintainers of the arches
involv
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
> USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI, USB_ARCH_HAS_OHCI, and USB_ARCH_HAS_XHCI were made
> obsolete in v3.11. They have not been used ever since. Setting them has
> no effect. They can safely be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
> ---
> Tested with "git grep".
>
> Not
On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 15:02 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Note that the comment in this Kconfig file (that is also removed)
> > suggests to first remove the select statements for these symbols and
> > then the symbols themselves. But I think it makes more sen
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:22:34AM +0100, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The two remaining patches from the previous series "usb: musb bugfixes". In v4
> I used the device name for the debugfs root dir and added a commit message to
> the second patch.
Felipe, could you please have a look a
On Friday, February 14, 2014 6:44 PM, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> On 02/13/2014 10:10 PM, dingu...@altera.com wrote:
> > From: Dinh Nguyen
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patch series combines the dwc2 host driver and the s3c-hsotg peripheral
> > driver into a single dual-roler driver similar to the dwc3.
Hello,
Following a few patches already in tree that add support for the USB
device controller of the Ingenic JZ4740 MIPS SoC, I documented the
process of writing an MUSB glue layer.
The JZ4740 MUSB controller offers a basic feature set, which makes the
glue layer implementation more simple than mo
Document the process of writing an musb glue layer by taking the
Ingenic JZ4740 glue layer as an example, as it seems more simple than
most glue layers due to the basic feature set of the JZ4740 USB device
controller.
Signed-off-by: Apelete Seketeli
---
Documentation/DocBook/Makefile
On 02/16/2014 05:37 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Friday, February 14, 2014 6:44 PM, Robert Baldyga wrote:
>> On 02/13/2014 10:10 PM, dingu...@altera.com wrote:
>>> From: Dinh Nguyen
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This patch series combines the dwc2 host driver and the s3c-hsotg peripheral
>>> driver into a
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 04:53:36PM +0100, Rolf Evers-Fischer wrote:
> Dear Peter,
> I hope that I didn't make any mistake, because this is my first linux kernel
> patch.
> If you don't mind, I'll send it directly to you as an attachment (and not to
> the
> kernel
> mailing list).
Please always fe
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 01:59:56PM +0100, Christian Gmeiner wrote:
> Hi Peter.
>
> I am currently trying to get HSIC working on an imx6d based board.
>
> Some time ago I asked if somebody has some patches etc. and got this:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg303281.html
>
> I needed so
On Monday, February 17, 2014 10:56 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>On 02/16/2014 05:37 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
>> On Friday, February 14, 2014 6:44 PM, Robert Baldyga wrote:
>>> On 02/13/2014 10:10 PM, dingu...@altera.com wrote:
From: Dinh Nguyen
Hello,
This patch series combines
In order to reduce the interrupt times in the embedded system,
a receiving workqueue is introduced.
This modification also enhanced the overall throughput as the
benefits of reducing interrupt occurrence.
Signed-off-by: Clanlab (Taiwan) Linux Project
Cc: David Brownell
Cc: David S. Miller
Cc: S
Hi Peter
2014-02-17 2:22 GMT+01:00 Peter Chen :
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 01:59:56PM +0100, Christian Gmeiner wrote:
>> Hi Peter.
>>
>> I am currently trying to get HSIC working on an imx6d based board.
>>
>> Some time ago I asked if somebody has some patches etc. and got this:
>> http://www.spini
17 matches
Mail list logo
