On Sunday 08 September 2013 10:50:35 Pali Rohár wrote:
> This patch series finally bringing support for charging
> battery on Nokia N900 (RX-51) without any proprietary Nokia
> bits in userspace.
>
> Pali Rohár (4):
> usb: musb: Call atomic_notifier_call_chain when status is
> changed power: isp
According to Prolific, several (unauthorized) cheap and less functional
clones of the PL2303HX chip are in circulation. [1]
I've had the chance to test such a cloned device and it turned out that
it doesn't support any baud rates above 115200 baud (original: 6 Mbaud)
It also doesn't support the div
Am 14.09.2013 12:13, schrieb Frank Schäfer:
> According to Prolific, several (unauthorized) cheap and less functional
> clones of the PL2303HX chip are in circulation. [1]
> I've had the chance to test such a cloned device and it turned out that
> it doesn't support any baud rates above 115200 baud
>
> Dear Peter Chen,
>
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:55:54PM +0200, gianluca wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I just compiled the kernel from git repo of peter chen
> > > (git://github.com/hzpeterchen/linux-usb)
> >
> > Please use current linux-next tree, it has already supported
> > mx28 evk for vbu
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:13:03PM +0200, Frank Schäfer wrote:
> According to Prolific, several (unauthorized) cheap and less functional
> clones of the PL2303HX chip are in circulation. [1]
No footnote showed up in this changelog comment, care to fix this up?
And really, cloned chips for such a
Am 14.09.2013 14:19, schrieb Greg KH:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:13:03PM +0200, Frank Schäfer wrote:
>> According to Prolific, several (unauthorized) cheap and less functional
>> clones of the PL2303HX chip are in circulation. [1]
> No footnote showed up in this changelog comment, care to fix thi
According to Prolific, several (unauthorized) cheap and less functional
clones of the PL2303HX chip are in circulation. [1]
I've had the chance to test such a cloned device and it turned out that
it doesn't support any baud rates above 115200 baud (original: 6 Mbaud)
It also doesn't support the div
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
>> Thanks. Maybe this is more relevant than I thought. I'd sure like to
>> copy your strategy rather than reinvent something.
>
> Well, I don't know if this will really end up being all that relevant
On Sat, 14 Sep 2013, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> This gets to the reason I'm interested -- we have PCI device removal
> issues, and I have been thinking of them largely as reference counting
> problems. I'd like to make the assertion that if you have a pci_bus
> or a pci_dev pointer, e.g., acquired by
