To begin with, the whole point of this RFC was to show that moving the
entire IRQ handler (or even a large part of it) to a tasklet would have
been at least as simple as moving the givebacks alone.
Now that I realize the hrtimer and unlink pathways would have to be
changed too, it's not quite so
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> >> For other HCDs, this changes on interrupt QH unlink may not need at all
> >> >> if there is no much cost about relink.
> >> >
> >> > But for some HCDs, it will be needed.
> >>
> >> Which HCDs need them?
> >
> > I haven't checked in detail. It seems lik
On 08/20/13 16:09, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Mike Turquette wrote:
[...]
OK, if new branch is ready, I will replace with that or if re-merge is
required, I will. Either way, I'm fine and can handle. Mike, let me know
your choice :-)
Since I have already published it let's just go with the delta p
The following changes since commit b36f4be3de1b123d8601de062e7dbfc904f305fb:
Linux 3.11-rc6 (2013-08-18 14:36:53 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/
tags/usb-3.11-rc7
for you to fetch changes up to 52d5b9aba1f5790ca32
>From 018343ce2e679d97283fb51da25c43aa876d087a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rob Gardner
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 16:02:23 -0600
Subject: [PATCH net,stable] net: usb: Add HP hs2434 device to ZLP exception
table
This patch adds another entry (HP hs2434 Mobile Broadband) to the list
of exceptional
Rob Gardner writes:
> From 018343ce2e679d97283fb51da25c43aa876d087a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Rob Gardner
> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 16:02:23 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH net,stable] net: usb: Add HP hs2434 device to ZLP exception
> table
>
> This patch adds another entry (HP hs2434 Mobile Broa
This patch redefine function xhci_readl.xhci_readl function doesn't use
xhci_hcd argument.
Hence there is no need of keeping it in the function arguments.
Redefining this function breaks other functions which calls this function.
This phatch also correct those calls in xhci driver.
Signed-off-
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 10:14 +0800, liujunliang_ljl wrote:
> do you need me to merge the patch and re-send it again.
I do not.
> And which version of kernel will release this driver.
No idea.
That's up to David Miller or Greg KH to pick
up the driver and maybe take the follow-on
patch I sent.
I
Dear all :
Thanks a lot.
2013-08-26
liujunliang_ljl
发件人： Joe Perches
发送时间： 2013-08-26 10:19:35
收件人： liujunliang_ljl
抄送： davem; horms; romieu; gregkh; netdev; linux-usb; linux-kernel; sunhecheng
主题： Re: Re: [PATCH] USB2NET : SR9700 : One chip USB 1.1 USB2NETSR9700Devi
DearJoe :
I'm sorry to ask you that, do you need me to merge the
patch and re-send it again.
And which version of kernel will release this driver.
Thanks a lot and apologizing for making you trouble.
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> To begin with, the whole point of this RFC was to show that moving the
> entire IRQ handler (or even a large part of it) to a tasklet would have
> been at least as simple as moving the givebacks alone.
>
> Now that I realize the hrtimer and unl
11 matches
Mail list logo
