On Friday 25 January 2008, Romit Dasgupta wrote:
> This should help
> reduce contention to usb during high load where i/o is happening to
> multiple hcds.
Looking at how this lock is used, contention doesn't look likely
to be an issue. It's never held for long ...
> @@ -1106,9 +1103,9 @@ EXPORT
Am Freitag, 25. Januar 2008 23:28:09 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:44:32PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 25. Januar 2008 17:58:56 schrieben Sie:
> > > Right now we use a "fake" vendor and product id for root hubs in the
> > > kernel. However, I'm happy to announce tha
>
>
> Looking at how this lock is used, contention doesn't look likely
> to be an issue. It's never held for long ...
yes in the general case but in usb_hcd_flush_endpoint routine it seems
to be held for longer than other routines. I agree that
usb_hcd_flush_endpoint is an infrequently called rout
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Freitag, 25. Januar 2008 23:28:09 schrieb Greg KH:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:44:32PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, 25. Januar 2008 17:58:56 schrieben Sie:
> > > > Right now we use a "fake" vendor and product id for root hubs in th
Am Samstag, 26. Januar 2008 16:56:39 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > "should" doesn't mean do. You want to make a change visible to user space.
> > That needs a reason beyond coolness.
>
> There was a reason. Some device was using ID 0, and Greg wanted to
> avoid a clash.
Sorry. Yes, that's a good reas
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:34:00 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9815
> > Problem Description: Cannot mount ipod or an external hard disk
> > Incidentally, I can mount my pen drive of 1 GB capacity. But
Hi, Greg:
I think the berry_charge is your baby. Please direct me to the
right person if it's not so.
I have a bug in Fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379341
It's pretty long, but the summary is this. When Blackberry is hooked
to a hub, it seems to try to re-initialize again
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:56:35 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a report here of a device in the wild that is using a USB vendor
> id of 0x. From everything I can tell, this _could_ be a valid
> vendor id, but I'm pretty sure that it isn't :)
Why would usb-if gi
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 08:40:48PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:56:35 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a report here of a device in the wild that is using a USB vendor
> > id of 0x. From everything I can tell, this _could_ be a
