Am Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2008 01:42:30 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:18:52PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2007 16:51:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > >
> > > > @@ -1080,20 +1081,22 @@ void usb_serial_disconne
Hy,
> Were you getting such messages from the kernel? "dmesg"
> would show them if you were.
Sorry, i forgot to mention that i included some "extended" printk's by myself.
> But again: if you're not already getting those warnings,
> don't bother looking since that's not the problem.
I get no me
Hy,
> The following thread is quite good. The author is quite good
> at USB and he thinks that usbser.sys is weird.
> http://www.cygnal.org/ubb/Forum9/HTML/000945.html
Thanks for your hint, i'll check it.
> Still I will think "unable to open COM Port" error may not be
> due to the device at all.
This documents two newly created files:
/sys/bus/usb/device/.../power/connected_duration
/sys/bus/usb/device/.../power/active_duration
Documentation was placed in Documentation/ABI/testing, since that's where the
documentation is for the other USB sysfs power files.
Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <[E
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:21:32AM -0800, Kevin Lloyd wrote:
> > Hm, no, the intrusion into the driver is just too much this late in
> the
> > release cycle to allow this.
> >
> > Now I will be glad to only add the new device ids for the devices that
> > do not rely on the new changes right now, bu
This patch is for the 2.6.24-rc8 kernel.
Added support for the Elster Unicom III Optical Probe.
The device ID has already been added to the usb.ids file.
Signed-off-by: Ed Beroset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -aur --exclude-from=a/.gitignore a/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c
b/drivers/usb/serial
> > Correct, the 0x0023 is the only newly added device that requires the
new
> > features.
>
> Does that mean things will not work for this device if it is added to
> the device table, without the code updates?
Adding the device will not break the driver (assuming you remove the
tag).
> And is thi
I have a printer device that is not listed in usb database:
T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=02 Cnt=01 Dev#= 18 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1
P: Vendor=10ce ProdID=000e Rev= 0.01
S: Manufacturer=SHINKO
S: Product=CHC-S2145
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:57:31AM +0100, Jordi Fern?ndez wrote:
>
> I have a printer device that is not listed in usb database:
What "usb database"? There is no such thing in the kernel.
> T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=02 Cnt=01 Dev#= 18 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
> D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Pr
