Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2014-01-08 Thread Xenia Ragiadakou
On 07/01/2014 11:46 μμ, Sarah Sharp wrote: On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 09:51:28PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: Okay, now we know that usb_enable_interface takes a long time. That routine does nothing but call usb_enable_endpoint, which does nothing but call usb_hcd_reset_endpoint, which calls the xhci_

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2014-01-07 Thread Sarah Sharp
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 09:51:28PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > Okay, now we know that usb_enable_interface takes a long time. That > routine does nothing but call usb_enable_endpoint, which does nothing > but call usb_hcd_reset_endpoint, which calls the xhci_endpoint_reset > routine. > > So we

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2013-12-25 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013, Matthias [ISO-8859-1] Bl�sing wrote: > The slow down can be tracked to: > > usb_enable_interface(dev, intf, true); > > I springled comments like this: > > > dev_info(&dev->dev, "T1\n"); > /* re-init hc/hcd interface/endpoint state */ > for (i = 0; i < con

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2013-12-25 Thread Matthias Bläsing
Hey Alan, On Mo, 2013-12-23 at 15:38 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Matthias [ISO-8859-1] Blsing wrote: > > Looking at the strace alone, I see, that the USBDEVFS_SETCONFIGURATION > > ioctl calls take excessive time. > > > > You're right; those calls took an excessively long time

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2013-12-23 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Matthias [ISO-8859-1] Bl�sing wrote: > I went ahead and did some runs (once I was able to reproduce the general > protection fault). The ehci port worked pretty fast (4 seconds from > start to GUI display), the xhci port took 7s in the best case to more > than one minute in th

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2013-12-22 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013, Matthias [ISO-8859-1] Bl�sing wrote: > To give some reference: This is Kernel 3.13.0-rc4 with both patches > applied. > > I now see also a device, that at least works partly now (I can scan with > scanimage and simple-scan, but xsane fails). I think xsane does some > more com

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2013-12-21 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 03:41:36PM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote: > The first one fixes an issue where userspace tries to reset a USB > endpoint when it's not actually halted: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=138116117104619&w=2 > Try applying them to the latest kernel and see if they fix your i

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2013-12-20 Thread Sarah Sharp
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 09:59:33PM +0100, Matthias Bläsing wrote: > Hey all, > > On Fr, 2013-12-13 at 17:53 +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:40:57PM +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > > > Is there a timeline when you think this could be fixed? > >

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2013-12-18 Thread Matthias Bläsing
Hey all, On Fr, 2013-12-13 at 17:53 +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:40:57PM +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > Is there a timeline when you think this could be fixed? > > > I tried with 3.10.x and 3.12.5 and the symptoms remain the same. The first

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2013-12-13 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:40:57PM +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: Good Evening, > Is there a timeline when you think this could be fixed? I tried with 3.10.x and 3.12.5 and the symptoms remain the same. The first time it is working, the second time the scanning does not start. The sc

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2013-05-28 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:01:04AM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: Good Evening, > > Maybe Sarah can give you some pointers on where to look next. > > I've asked for a physical bus trace from one of our QA folks with the > same scanner. I think that will shed some light on whether this is a > host-si

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2012-10-22 Thread Sarah Sharp
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:15:09PM +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:01:04AM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > Dear Sarah, > > > > Maybe Sarah can give you some pointers on where to look next. > > > > I've asked for a physical bus trace from one of our QA folks wi

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2012-10-22 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:01:04AM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: Dear Sarah, > > Maybe Sarah can give you some pointers on where to look next. > > I've asked for a physical bus trace from one of our QA folks with the > same scanner. I think that will shed some light on whether this is a > host-side

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2012-10-22 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:52:16AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: Dear Alan, thanks for having a look. > Did you connect the scanner to the computer with a USB-2 cable or a > USB-3 cable? Not that it's supposed to matter... I used the same ca

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2012-10-22 Thread Sarah Sharp
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:52:16AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 04:21:47PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > Unfortunately there's nothing here to indicate the cause of the > problem. Either the scanner just stopped working

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2012-10-22 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 04:21:47PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Holger Freyther wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > Actually, it would help to compare two usbmon traces taken on the same > > computer, one using xhci-hcd and the

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2012-10-15 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Holger Freyther wrote: > Holger Freyther writes: > > > > > > Debian unstable switched to libusbx but kept the package name at > > libusb. I have tested this with version 1.0.12.Okay, I see that there > > has been some usb 3.0 changes in 1.0.13 and 1.0.14 and I am going to

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2012-10-15 Thread Holger Freyther
Holger Freyther writes: > > Debian unstable switched to libusbx but kept the package name at > libusb. I have tested this with version 1.0.12.Okay, I see that there > has been some usb 3.0 changes in 1.0.13 and 1.0.14 and I am going to > test again. I have tested with 38e6eb86b2 (two commits a

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2012-10-15 Thread Holger Freyther
Alan Stern writes: > > What is the bugzilla report number? it is #48801. > It's notable that the pcap file does not show any data being sent from > the scanner to the computer, only from the computer to the scanner. Did I use usbmom/wireshark incorrectly? > The necessary support isn't

Re: xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2012-10-15 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Holger Freyther wrote: > Hi, > > I have some severe issues with USB on a new system. This is > an Acer Aspire S5 (i7, Ivybridge) and the scanner can be mostly > classified as non working. > > Symptoms: > 1.) Start a scan application (e.g. simple-scan) > 2.) Scan a page > 3.)

xhci_hcd and Canon Lide 110 not playing well together

2012-10-15 Thread Holger Freyther
Hi, I have some severe issues with USB on a new system. This is an Acer Aspire S5 (i7, Ivybridge) and the scanner can be mostly classified as non working. Symptoms: 1.) Start a scan application (e.g. simple-scan) 2.) Scan a page 3.) Exit the app 4.) Start a scan application (e.g. simple-scan) 5.)