Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-05-01 Thread Peter Münster
On Wed, Apr 30 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > Okay, good. Below is a patch which I hope will fix your problem. You > can leave diag1 in place if you want, but remove all the other patches. Hi Alan, Yes, it works very well with latest git-kernel (3.15-rc3). Thanks, -- Peter -- To unsub

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-30 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > > It's noticeable that your logs include resets of the affected devices, > > whereas the older kernels did not need any resets. This suggests that > > these OHCI controllers will always have problems with glob

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-29 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, Apr 29 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > It's noticeable that your logs include resets of the affected devices, > whereas the older kernels did not need any resets. This suggests that > these OHCI controllers will always have problems with global suspend, > and therefore a controller-specific fix

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-29 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > > That's interesting. Here's another test you should try with that same > > kernel. Start moving the mouse before you wake up the system, and keep > > moving it until the system has fully resumed. When you d

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-29 Thread Peter Münster
On Mon, Apr 28 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > That's interesting. Here's another test you should try with that same > kernel. Start moving the mouse before you wake up the system, and keep > moving it until the system has fully resumed. When you do this, does > it work right? That is, when the scre

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-28 Thread Alan Stern
On Sat, 26 Apr 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > > Here's diag5; it's essentially a subset of diag4. Test it in the same > > way. > > > > (Not being able to wake up the system from the keyboard is expected > > for diag4. With diag5, you may or may not be ab

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-26 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, Apr 22 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > Here's diag5; it's essentially a subset of diag4. Test it in the same > way. > > (Not being able to wake up the system from the keyboard is expected > for diag4. With diag5, you may or may not be able to use the keyboard > for wakeup -- try it and see. I

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-22 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > > Here's a new diagnostic patch (diag4) to try, on the same kernel, along > > with diag1 and nothing else. This patch does almost the same thing as > > turning off CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND used to do in earlier ve

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-22 Thread Peter Münster
On Mon, Apr 21 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > Here's a new diagnostic patch (diag4) to try, on the same kernel, along > with diag1 and nothing else. This patch does almost the same thing as > turning off CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND used to do in earlier versions of the > kernel. If the behavior is consiste

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-21 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 20 Apr 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > > Below is a first simple attempt, let's call it fix1. This should be > > applied to the kernel you have been using, with diag1 but without any > > of the diag3* patches. What happens with fix1 and with the mou

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-20 Thread Peter Münster
On Fri, Apr 18 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > Below is a first simple attempt, let's call it fix1. This should be > applied to the kernel you have been using, with diag1 but without any > of the diag3* patches. What happens with fix1 and with the mouse > plugged into the rear? Hi Alan, It does not wo

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-18 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 17 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > > >> Just to verify, please try replacing diag3 with each of the two patches > >> below (one at a time). If my guess is right, diag3a will work and > >> diag3b

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-17 Thread Peter Münster
On Thu, Apr 17 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > >> Just to verify, please try replacing diag3 with each of the two patches >> below (one at a time). If my guess is right, diag3a will work and >> diag3b will fail. > > Yes, you're right! Sorry, I've forgotten

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-17 Thread Peter Münster
On Thu, Apr 17 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > Just to verify, please try replacing diag3 with each of the two patches > below (one at a time). If my guess is right, diag3a will work and > diag3b will fail. Yes, you're right! -- Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-17 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > > How many diagnostic patches have you tried so far? I've lost track. > > Hi Alan, > > diag1: the one with the alan-timer > diag2: reverts commit 0aa2832dd0d9d860 and instead, prints >out informati

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-16 Thread Peter Münster
On Mon, Apr 14 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > How many diagnostic patches have you tried so far? I've lost track. Hi Alan, diag1: the one with the alan-timer diag2: reverts commit 0aa2832dd0d9d860 and instead, prints out information showing what the commit would do diag3: partially reverts

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-14 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 01 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > >> Should I do another git-bisect? > > > > > > Yes, that would be a good idea. > > > > Hi Alan, > > > > Here is the result: > > > > e583d9db9960cf40e0bc8afee

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-10 Thread Peter Münster
On Thu, Apr 10 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > I should have guessed... :-( Next time, we can try some guesses before bisecting, right? -- Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo inf

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-10 Thread Peter Münster
On Wed, Apr 02 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > Below is 0aa2832dd0d9d860 back-ported to 3.9. Please try testing a 3.9 > kernel with this patch installed (and also the first diagnostic patch, > if it applies with no errors), with CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND _enabled_ and > the mouse plugged into the rear port. >

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-10 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > >> Should I do another git-bisect? > > > > Yes, that would be a good idea. > > Hi Alan, > > Here is the result: > > e583d9db9960cf40e0bc8afee4946baa9d71596e is the first bad commit > commit e583d9db9960cf40e

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-10 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, Apr 01 2014, Alan Stern wrote: >> Should I do another git-bisect? > > Yes, that would be a good idea. Hi Alan, Here is the result: e583d9db9960cf40e0bc8afee4946baa9d71596e is the first bad commit commit e583d9db9960cf40e0bc8afee4946baa9d71596e Author: Alan Stern Date: Thu Jul 11 14:5

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-07 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > > No error messages about hung-up tasks 120 seconds later? > > Sorry. I had forgotten to wait 2 minutes... > > Here again the log with information about hung-up tasks. This looks a lot like what you got befor

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-07 Thread Peter Münster
On Fri, Apr 04 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > No error messages about hung-up tasks 120 seconds later? Sorry. I had forgotten to wait 2 minutes... Here again the log with information about hung-up tasks. -- Peter [ 97.307415] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done. [ 97.412888] PM: Prepari

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-04 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > >> > Also, I'd like to track down the problem when both devices are plugged > >> > into front ports. Can you try that as well, again without the new > >> > diagnostic patch? > >> > >> The system hangs... > > >

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-04 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, Apr 01 2014, Alan Stern wrote: >> > Also, I'd like to track down the problem when both devices are plugged >> > into front ports. Can you try that as well, again without the new >> > diagnostic patch? >> >> The system hangs... > > Do you have a netconsole log? Hi Alan, Yes, here: [ 46

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-02 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > > Also, I'd like to track down the problem when both devices are plugged > > into front ports. Can you try that as well, again without the new > > diagnostic patch? If the problem in this case is caused by a s

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-01 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > > These all seem to be basically the same, apart from the Nouveau issue. > > This suggests that the previous test (i.e., without the new diagnostic > > patch) would have worked if _nothing_ was plugged into a

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-01 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, Apr 01 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > Also, I'd like to track down the problem when both devices are plugged > into front ports. Can you try that as well, again without the new > diagnostic patch? If the problem in this case is caused by a separate > bug then we may not learn anything, but it

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-04-01 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, Apr 01 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > These all seem to be basically the same, apart from the Nouveau issue. > This suggests that the previous test (i.e., without the new diagnostic > patch) would have worked if _nothing_ was plugged into a front port and > the keyboard was plugged into the

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-03-31 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > > That's totally crazy. With wakeup enabled, the commit should have had > > no effect at all. > > Hi Alan, > > With 0aa2832dd0d9d860 kernel, the freeze happens only when something is > connected to the rear

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-03-30 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > > One more thing... The bad commit should have no effect on devices > > enabled for wakeup -- and keyboards generally _are_ enabled for wakeup. > > Can you check this? Under 3.12.x with no patches or reversions, > > I've just added your diagnostic p

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-03-30 Thread Peter Münster
On Fri, Mar 28 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > This just raises more questions. It looks like it worked almost okay, > but not quite. Certainly it didn't hang, so it isn't an exact > reproduction of the problem. Can you run the same test again, and then > at the end, do: > > echo 1 >/sys/bus/us

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-03-28 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > Hi Alan, > > These are my commands: > > echo 8 >/proc/sys/kernel/printk > echo on >/sys/bus/usb/devices/4-2/power/control > sleep 1 > echo 0 >/sys/bus/usb/devices/4-2/bConfigurationValue > sleep 1 > echo auto >/sys/bus/pci/devices/:00:12.1/power/co

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-03-27 Thread Peter Münster
On Thu, Mar 27 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > Oops -- I just realized that the instructions I sent you before were > incomplete. Please try running the same test again, but this time > issue the following commands to suspend the device: > > echo on >/sys/bus/usb/devices/4-2/power/control >

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-03-27 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > > Please try running the test again. When it finishes, go to the > > /sys/kernel/debug/usb/ohci/:00:12.1/ directory and post a copy of > > the "registers" file. > > > > Check the contents of that file seve

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-03-26 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > > Below is a patch you should apply to normal 3.14 (nothing reverted). > > Hi Alan, > > I've used 3.12.14, because the source-tree is already set up. I hope > that this is ok. Yes. > > For this test, plug

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-03-25 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, Mar 25 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > Below is a patch you should apply to normal 3.14 (nothing reverted). Hi Alan, I've used 3.12.14, because the source-tree is already set up. I hope that this is ok. > For this test, plug some device you aren't going to use (the mouse, for > example, if

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-03-25 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > > All three files show the system hanging after the resume, even the file > > with nothing in the rear ports. Also, the logs are incomplete; it > > looks like a bunch of stuff is missing from the start of the

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-03-24 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > > I'd like to see a comparable log showing what happens when you suspend > > with only the mouse plugged in to a rear port, and one with only the > > keyboard plugged in to the rear. No serial ports or other stuff. > > Please find attached 3 files: > -

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-03-19 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18 2014, Alan Stern wrote: > > >> Commit 0aa2832dd0d9d8609fd8f15139bc7572541a1215 introduces a problem for > >> my system: > > > > You should include the name of the commit along with the hash ID; > > otherwise nobody will know what it is

Re: problem with resume after s2ram

2014-03-18 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Peter Münster wrote: > Hi, > > Commit 0aa2832dd0d9d8609fd8f15139bc7572541a1215 introduces a problem for > my system: You should include the name of the commit along with the hash ID; otherwise nobody will know what it is unless they go to the trouble of looking it up for t

problem with resume after s2ram

2014-03-18 Thread Peter Münster
Hi, Commit 0aa2832dd0d9d8609fd8f15139bc7572541a1215 introduces a problem for my system: When it wakes up after s2ram, it freezes. Screen is black, keyboard does not work, no ssh-connection. Just the network-ping works. Please see here for more details, especially information about the hardware: h