On 8/14/12, Chen Peter-B29397 wrote:
> HW_USBPHY_CTRL.ENHOSTDISCONDETECT should be set after bus reset is
> finished.
I agree. How do we guarantee that ENHOSTDISCONDETECT is set after bus reset?
Thanks,
Fabio Estevam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
th
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:11:53AM +0800, Chen Peter-B29397 wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > It is the same with i.mx28.
> > If they're same, imx23 should be ok. The mxs_phy driver pass test
> > on mx28.
> > > I think Richard's patch should not
> > > violate point 2. Richard, can you confirm it?
> > You me
> > >
> > It is the same with i.mx28.
> If they're same, imx23 should be ok. The mxs_phy driver pass test
> on mx28.
> > I think Richard's patch should not
> > violate point 2. Richard, can you confirm it?
> You mean I should not set the bit in mxs_phy_on_connect?
> or mxs_phy_on_connect is calle
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:40:21AM +0800, Chen Peter-B29397 wrote:
>
> >
> > > According to IC guys, the logic of handling HOSTDISCONDETECT is the
> > same
> > > between i.mx28 and i.mx23.
> >
> > As pointed out by Sean, on mx23 reference manual we have the following
> > text describing HOSTDIS
>
> > According to IC guys, the logic of handling HOSTDISCONDETECT is the
> same
> > between i.mx28 and i.mx23.
>
> As pointed out by Sean, on mx23 reference manual we have the following
> text describing HOSTDISCONDETECT:
>
> "Due to a on chip issue (Errata #2791), software must
> pay attenti
-B20223; Shawn Guo; Marek Vasut; Li Frank-B20596
> Subject: Re: mxs-phy on i.MX233 not enumerating
>
> Peter,
>
> On 8/13/12, Chen Peter-B29397 wrote:
>
> > According to IC guys, the logic of handling HOSTDISCONDETECT is the
> same
> > between i.mx28 and i.m
Peter,
On 8/13/12, Chen Peter-B29397 wrote:
> According to IC guys, the logic of handling HOSTDISCONDETECT is the same
> between i.mx28 and i.mx23.
As pointed out by Sean, on mx23 reference manual we have the following
text describing HOSTDISCONDETECT:
"Due to a on chip issue (Errata #2791), s
Dear Chen Peter-B29397,
> > On 8/13/12, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > Will there be another version for this or is this final ? Won't this
> > > cause any regressions to other boards ?
> >
> > The proposed patch is not meant to be a final one.
> >
> > We still need to figure out the proper way to h
> On 8/13/12, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> > Will there be another version for this or is this final ? Won't this
> > cause any regressions to other boards ?
>
> The proposed patch is not meant to be a final one.
>
> We still need to figure out the proper way to handle HOSTDISCONDETECT
> for all i
On 8/13/12, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Will there be another version for this or is this final ? Won't this
> cause any regressions to other boards ?
The proposed patch is not meant to be a final one.
We still need to figure out the proper way to handle HOSTDISCONDETECT
for all i.mx SoCs, including
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 03:04:56PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On 8/13/12, Sean Cross wrote:
> > We're trying to get USB host mode working on a Freescale i.MX233. I'm
> > using
> > a chumby hacker board, but there are several people trying on an OlinuXino
> > board as well. We're running
On 8/13/12, Sean Cross wrote:
> We're trying to get USB host mode working on a Freescale i.MX233. I'm
> using
> a chumby hacker board, but there are several people trying on an OlinuXino
> board as well. We're running into a problem where every time the root hub
> is detected, it's disconnected.
We're trying to get USB host mode working on a Freescale i.MX233. I'm using
a chumby hacker board, but there are several people trying on an OlinuXino
board as well. We're running into a problem where every time the root hub
is detected, it's disconnected. This results in kernel messages such as
13 matches
Mail list logo
