> From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:ba...@ti.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:39 PM
>
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:14:34PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:ba...@ti.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:11 PM
> > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:22:33PM +, Pa
lto:ba...@ti.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 2:36 AM
> > > > To: Paul Zimmerman; Kishon Vijay Abraham I; Linux USB Mailing List
> > > > Subject: dwc3 PHY autosuspend feature
> > > >
> > > > Hi Paul,
> > >
ul Zimmerman; Kishon Vijay Abraham I; Linux USB Mailing List
> > > Subject: dwc3 PHY autosuspend feature
> > >
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > Kishon has uncovered a possible 'situation' with dwc3 which we need to
> > > clear up.
> > >
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:22:33PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:ba...@ti.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 2:36 AM
> > To: Paul Zimmerman; Kishon Vijay Abraham I; Linux USB Mailing List
> > Subject: dwc3 PHY autosuspend
Sorry for replying to myself, but I forgot to answer one question: No,
PHY autosuspend is not an optional feature, every core since 1.94a
has it.
--
Paul
> From: Paul Zimmerman
> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:23 AM
>
> > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:ba...@ti.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 0
> From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:ba...@ti.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 2:36 AM
> To: Paul Zimmerman; Kishon Vijay Abraham I; Linux USB Mailing List
> Subject: dwc3 PHY autosuspend feature
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Kishon has uncovered a possible 'situation' wit
Hi Paul,
Kishon has uncovered a possible 'situation' with dwc3 which we need to
clear up.
According to your commit 802fde98 (usb: dwc3: support new revisions of
DWC3 core), we don't need to suspend/resume the PHYs at all with any
version > 1.94a, but what we observe is that SUSPHY bits are never
