On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 03:41:33PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> I'm testing uas in a virtual machine, qemu 1.2 (to be released soon)
> features uas emulation support. Only usb 2.0 for now, qemu usb
> emulation can't handle streams and other 3.0 stuff. Yet.
Ah good to know. So there is an altern
On 08/17/12 15:01, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 02:13:40PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>>> I just noticed some of my patches here got reverted. Do you have any
>>> hardware
>>> or did you just stumble over it? I have just my target UAS gadget…
>>
>> No hardware. Do
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 03:05:15PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Friday 17 August 2012 15:01:16 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > It is possible that you get -ENOMEM while a command is already being
> > > executed. The worst case is probably that you got a command to the device
> > > and y
On Friday 17 August 2012 15:01:16 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > It is possible that you get -ENOMEM while a command is already being
> > executed. The worst case is probably that you got a command to the device
> > and you need to do autosense, but you get -ENOMEM.
>
> Looking at the code,
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 02:13:40PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > I just noticed some of my patches here got reverted. Do you have any
> > hardware
> > or did you just stumble over it? I have just my target UAS gadgetâ¦
>
> No hardware. Do you have suggestions where to get hardware?
No. I've b
On Friday 17 August 2012 13:11:30 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:23:15PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >
> > > No, you are right. If the command EP was closed and the URB submission
> > > then it
> > > will retry over and over again.
> >
> > Well, what remedy woul
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:23:15PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > No, you are right. If the command EP was closed and the URB submission then
> > it
> > will retry over and over again.
>
> Well, what remedy would you suggest?
I just noticed some of my patches here got reverted. Do you have
On Thursday 16 August 2012 16:03:36 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:48:56PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > going through uas it looks to me like there is a race by which
> > uas_do_work() can walk uas_work_list and do IO to a device
> > after it has been removed. This
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:48:56PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> going through uas it looks to me like there is a race by which
> uas_do_work() can walk uas_work_list and do IO to a device
> after it has been removed. This makes me wonder why you used
> a single global list. Could you comment on th
Hi,
going through uas it looks to me like there is a race by which
uas_do_work() can walk uas_work_list and do IO to a device
after it has been removed. This makes me wonder why you used
a single global list. Could you comment on that and tell me whether
I missed something subtle?
Regards
10 matches
Mail list logo
